Spike
TS Contributor
- Favourite Ride
- Taron
Nemesis - The Pit - I could see how this would cost a lot. The ride's budget was £10m (approx 19m in todays money), so £4m on marketing, meaning the B&M coaster and pit was probably in the region of £6m. Maybe £1m for the pit and £5m on ride hardware? Seems more realistic to me.
Air - The Technology - Negative. This is B&M's product, that wouldn't cost the park.
Oblivion - The tunnel - Agree, hence why the ride is so short, and I'm sure the water splash section was cut also.
Th13teen - The freefall drop - Negative. Intamin already had the magnetic braking technology, and again the drop track setion is another product for them now, one that they've gone on to sell with other rides.
The Smiler - Sheer amount of steel - Negative. Gerstlauer are cheap, and Saw is a similarly lengthy ride.
SW8 - We'll have to wait and see - I do hope there is some "secret" even if it's just something as simple as The Smiler's first inversion, which they were so keen to hide. It will certainly add more interest in the build up to opening day.
What I was actually meaning was visual justification for the advertised budget to the general public etc, not our own who know the cost of rides.
Nemesis - could be easily covered by the excavation costs
Oblivion - As above - "it goes for miles underground and must have cost millions!!"
Air - At the time the technology could be perceived as witchcraft and so the GP would have thought "oh yes this must have cost millions to make"
Th13teen - For similar effect as the drop mechanics would not be cheap in the eyes of the GP because it was 'World's first'.
The Smiler - "All that metal and stuffs must have cost millions!!"
I know they play around with figures but if SW8 is advertised enough at £15million and it doesn't have any of the above GP perceptions then it may back fire. That's what I was getting at