not really, according to Ryan the ride mechanic he thinks that not much big modifications will happen, and describes now as growing pains, every time it stalls they note it down, make a slight change (use harder wheel compounds, less wheel grease etc) and continue.Yes, they are great for hangtime, but there is good reason why most rides haven’t been historically designed like this. Seems like some element of redesign and significant spend will be needed to take away this risk.
not really, according to Ryan the ride mechanic he thinks that not much big modifications will happen, and describes now as growing pains, every time it stalls they note it down, make a slight change (use harder wheel compounds, less wheel grease etc) and continue.
From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN7ccQtTJmU
on the point of spare trains appart from large number of train coasters (wild mice type) it is only really common with year round parks, as they have to keep one train out constantly rebuilding it for its yearly checks,
If it’s stalled fully laden (albeit with dummies) then I suspect they aren’t in a rush to put it back any time soon. One train is possibly the least painful option they have.
you would be surprised, the wheel compound can do a lot alone, to simplify a good example is like having low pressure in your tires vs extreme pressure in your car tires, the low pressure will deform more, this results in a smoother ride, etc but that deformation generates heat and will reduce the kinematic energy of the vehicle more than if it didn't deform, the grease will also have an effect reducing it can reduce the rolling resistance of the bearing, there are more things like wheel pre-load that may be adjusted which can reduce the friction, but would come with other conciquences.Not convinced you can eek out enough improvement from such minor changes. It should not be a dark cloud of uncertainty every time the temperature drops or the wind picks up a bit. A reminder that a train should be able to go round comfortably without dummies, in all reasonably expected weather conditions.
This, like all problems, could be solved with rocket boosters
I wonder if Mack anticipated that rollbacks were a potential problem with a floaty ride such as Hyperia, and so deliberately designed the trains in such a way that they could be modified to go faster if required? (e.g. by initially using the combination of grease and compound that would give the slowest possible ride at first)
I wonder if Mack anticipated that rollbacks were a potential problem with a floaty ride such as Hyperia, and so deliberately designed the trains in such a way that they could be modified to go faster if required? (e.g. by initially using the combination of grease and compound that would give the slowest possible ride at first)
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, why would they not be trying to get back to two-train ops ahead of Fright Nights?Hyperia seems to have opened from near enough 10am today, which probably means it's unlikely to revert to 2 trains this year imo.
I would say that it's essential to put it at two trains as soon as it's practically possible as it being Fright Nights, I'd imagine 5 hour queues during October Half Term if it remains on one train ops.That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, why would they not be trying to get back to two-train ops ahead of Fright Nights?
Surely it makes sense to continue operating with one train until the second one is ready to be put back into action?
Is there a reason why Thorpe Park wait until almost 10 a.m. before warming up the ride, instead of starting an hour or two earlier than the other rides? (given all of the problems that it's having)two whole hours to get the thing open is too long.