Rick
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Crux



I won't put the whole thing here, in fear of another bandwidth surge - but check the rest out here by all means.
Last edited:
Interestingly, 1990 was the exact year of the Tussauds takeover!Is this before or after the Tussauds takeover?
Hadn't spotted that!See image one!
I have one from 1989 that's almost exactly the same, but with a page about John Broome that was taken out of this one. So really it was produced before Tussauds but with their logo slapped on and any references to old management gone.Is this before or after the Tussauds takeover?
However the 1990 version includes the Thunderlooper, I am surprised it is not more prominent in the brochure as it was the new ride for that year.I have one from 1989 that's almost exactly the same, but with a page about John Broome that was taken out of this one. So really it was produced before Tussauds but with their logo slapped on and any references to old management gone.
I have one from 1989 that's almost exactly the same, but with a page about John Broome that was taken out of this one. So really it was produced before Tussauds but with their logo slapped on and any references to old management gone.
However the 1990 version includes the Thunderlooper, I am surprised it is not more prominent in the brochure as it was the new ride for that year.
Is there any reference to Ina's rock in any literature? By design or by obligation, the path is in great condition and it's literally 2 or 3 mins walk from CB hotel.
Indeed - apologies, I missed out the word 'contemporary' when asking if it' mentioned in guides and the like - it's always mentioned in Broome era literature, but after the new security fence went up, there's hardly anything.I've seen it referenced quite a lot, but very few maps have it in the right location. More often then not I've seen it labelled out by Cuckoo Rock behind Dark Forest.
I thought the park fought pretty hard to keep Thunder Looper operating?I think that was probably because of the Tussauds takeover. The 1990 additions were not called out in any way in the brochures that year, which I think was because they hadn't been added by Tussauds and they had already flagged them as attractions they wanted to get rid of ASAP, so it made more sense to 'bury' them, so to speak.
You're absolutely right, turns out I totally misremembered the 89 one and apart from the blue cover and general style they're actually completely different.I'd be fascinated to see that. I have a 1989 brochure that is veeeeery different with lots and lots and lots (and lots) of text.