Assuming this is Bjorn, but I'm not seeing any proof he's gone to Universal.I don’t know if it’s been posted already but a Paris Imagineer has left DLP to go to Universal it is believed to be UK Universal
I did see a lot of speculation where there's a lot of people who believe Potter won't be there because of the Studio Tour.All the chatter online is that Potter is definitely a no go. And to be honest, I think that makes sense. We don’t need a fake Kings Cross or Diagon Ally to be built when the real deal is 60mins away.
I’d expect Jurassic World and Nintendoland to be built but am unsure on others.
A How to Train Your Dragon area would be nice; and this is also a UK authored book remember.
I would also really hope for some kind of James Bond attraction; seems like a no brainer to me.
I'm pretty sure that the Studio Tour and the Theme Park can quite easily co-exist
The Wizarding World will likely not appear at a Universal park in this country (pending Bedford getting approved in the first place) because they don't have the rights to open one in this market. UK attraction rights remain firmly with Warner Bros. Discovery, and it's unlikely that they'll want a competing attraction on their doorstep.I did see a lot of speculation where there's a lot of people who believe Potter won't be there because of the Studio Tour.
Whilst that is a good point, my thoughts is how is Japan able to have a Wizarding World area in a Universal Park and a Studio Tour if attraction rights are with one park.The Wizarding World will likely not appear at a Universal park in this country (pending Bedford getting approved in the first place) because they don't have the rights to open one in this market. UK attraction rights remain firmly with Warner Bros. Discovery, and it's unlikely that they'll want a competing attraction on their doorstep.
The rights aren't with a single park operator worldwide, but Universal did negotiate for rights for the parks they had in existence at the time.Whilst that is a good point, my thoughts is how is Japan able to have a Wizarding World area in a Universal Park and a Studio Tour if attraction rights are with one park.
It could be explained if it works differently to the UK. That makes sense.
If it's similar, it may not be as much of a barrier.
I do honestly think that the attractions will complement each other rather than complete with each other. With the UK being where Wizarding World originated, I'd see a very big market that the Studio Tour and Universal UK could co-exist very well in my opinion.
I'd be inclined to agree with you, if the operators weren't generally competing with each other on everything else. There's already a messy law suit between HBO (owned by Warner Bros. Discovery) and Sky (owned by Comcast, who also own Universal), because HBO won't allow Sky to co-produce the new Harry Potter TV series. Admittedly this was settled out of court last week, but it's led to an eventual termination of Sky's exclusive right to HBO content in the UK and an exclusion on the Harry Potter project.Would they be competing attractions? One is a theme park with rides, the other a studio tour with props and sets used in the real life films. Different types of attractions, different experiences. I think both would have good enough of a USP to coexist and both could even help one another. I see more positive than negative.
(obviously ignoring the rights issue here)
I feel like the Potter discussion is going to go in circles for years to come, even when they announce the details of the park and afterwards, when the park has opened, people will STILL be discussing whether Potter is coming to the park. Until any significant information comes to light, I'd rather not see the discussion loop of "will Potter be coming?", I'd much rather discuss other IPs or any planning considerations within the park.Unless they see a legitimate opportunity to make additional profit from the IP.
The world is not black and white, so I don't think at this point you can make any assumptions about what is or isn't on the table.
On the universal forum someone who’s quite in the know has said it’s not happening, disappointing but they’re trustworthy.Unless they see a legitimate opportunity to make additional profit from the IP.
The world is not black and white, so I don't think at this point you can make any assumptions about what is or isn't on the table.
I’ve just had a scan over the forums and can’t see anything that relates to this? Could you post more info please?On the universal forum someone who’s quite in the know has said it’s not happening, disappointing but they’re trustworthy.
As you can imagine this conversation spanned pages and pages just like it has hereI’ve just had a scan over the forums and can’t see anything that relates to this? Could you post more info please?
I’ve read over it and it just seems like she’s referring to Potter? Can’t see anything else about the park not happening though?As you can imagine this conversation spanned pages and pages just like it has here
Post 1957 by Alicia, she runs the Theme Park Stop YouTube channel that’s all about Universal parks, if she says it’s not happening it’s not happening.
I’ve read over it and it just seems like she’s referring to Potter? Can’t see anything else about the park not happening though?