- News all the latest
- Theme Park explore the park
- Resort tour the resort
- Future looking forward
- History looking back
- Community and meetups
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks. - Thread starter s_g_k
- Start date
- Favourite Ride
- Legend
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Swiss Cottage Restaurant
AT86
TS Member
Swiss Cottage is Grade II listed, they did apply for permission and completed some works a couple of years back to remove some of the more recent extensions that had been added in the 70/80’s when it became a restaurant as they were in a poor state and weren’t in keeping with the original building.

It would be good to see it put back to some use, but I suspect the costs versus return would be a tricky one to get funding for.

It would be good to see it put back to some use, but I suspect the costs versus return would be a tricky one to get funding for.
cookiee_munster
TS Member
It's a shame it's a little too out of the way to really be something for guests to go and use. I was surprised by how big it is inside (a VERY large cottage) but probably not big enough to be a proper sit down restaurant. Just echoing what other people are saying, it's not in a very heavy foot traffic area to really get much attention, and I think it'd struggle if it were a restaurant.
Even as a tearoom, I couldn't really see it being super popular enough to be profitable.
If there was enough attention put on the gardens for older visitors then maybe it could be used as a quick service place for people needing something to go, but again, you'd have to get a lot of people in the gardens for it to be really deemed profitable.
Even as a tearoom, I couldn't really see it being super popular enough to be profitable.
If there was enough attention put on the gardens for older visitors then maybe it could be used as a quick service place for people needing something to go, but again, you'd have to get a lot of people in the gardens for it to be really deemed profitable.
BigShadowtinytree
TS Member
Ignoring the work that inevitably needs to be done on the cottage to make it safe for a second, would it work as a vip experience that you can book? Just do a fancy afternoon tea package, bottomless tea, fancy cups and saucers. With some other extras included like some sort of towers merch, maybe a small resin of the cottage itself? Upgrades you can purchase too. Handful of bookings each day say between 11-3pm. Due to it being booked in advance they’ll only need to order what they need for their bookings and opening times limited so costs would be kept lower in that sense. But they could still charge for a premium experience in a unique setting. Might be profitable that way if they advertised it well.
James
TS Founding Member
If the gardens were sorted and cared for more attentively, then advertised more, it would work very nicely simply as a tea room during the summer months, with teas, scones, ice creams, some sandwiches…
It could work as an experience type thing. Maybe a ‘heritage experience’. Guided tour of the Towers ruins, tour of the gardens, followed by afternoon tea.
I wish Towers would treat their heritage with more love and make it a part of the resort experience. Merlin/Towers have really let that side of the resort down. I know they’ve done some work and restorations but that feels more of an obligation. The Towers is one giant storage facility, the gardens have been rotting and overgrowing for years. Hopefully something Bianca and co can improve over the coming years.
It could work as an experience type thing. Maybe a ‘heritage experience’. Guided tour of the Towers ruins, tour of the gardens, followed by afternoon tea.
I wish Towers would treat their heritage with more love and make it a part of the resort experience. Merlin/Towers have really let that side of the resort down. I know they’ve done some work and restorations but that feels more of an obligation. The Towers is one giant storage facility, the gardens have been rotting and overgrowing for years. Hopefully something Bianca and co can improve over the coming years.
ScottishChris
TS Member
I've always liked the idea of it being turned into a premium place "hotel offering" - somewhere to stay actually in the park. There would clearly be issues around limiting access around the park and monitoring movements, but it could really be a real premium (ie. Money spinning) product.
For example - if they could turn it into a 4 bedroom luxury home. After hours you have access to the gardens and your own concierge who could drive you to the hotel bars, your car etc. in a golf cart. They could easily charge £2-3k a night (maybe even more) and I have no doubt people would pay it.
For example - if they could turn it into a 4 bedroom luxury home. After hours you have access to the gardens and your own concierge who could drive you to the hotel bars, your car etc. in a golf cart. They could easily charge £2-3k a night (maybe even more) and I have no doubt people would pay it.
Accommodation offering wouldn't work due to people sneaking out at night into the park. However, as someone said above, it could work if it was only open in the summer months for somewhere to sit outside and have a drink and a cake while enjoying the later evening openings in the sunshine. Plenty of room outside for tables and chairs
Dave
TS Founding Member
What about use for weddings? Sort the gardens out and it would be a lovely venue.
It’s really not that big, it has a large “facade” but it’s not a very deep building. You wouldn’t get enough people in for a wedding.
Squiggs
TS Team
You'd get enough for a wedding, but not a large wedding. You'd maybe be able to get a congregation of 50, so suitable in some circumstances.
But like Rob says, they'd need to sort out the Gardens first, you'd be paying a premium for the view, and at the moment the view is a little... neglected.
But like Rob says, they'd need to sort out the Gardens first, you'd be paying a premium for the view, and at the moment the view is a little... neglected.
Dave
TS Founding Member
You'd get enough for a wedding, but not a large wedding. You'd maybe be able to get a congregation of 50, so suitable in some circumstances.
But like Rob says, they'd need to sort out the Gardens first, you'd be paying a premium for the view, and at the moment the view is a little... neglected.
In the biggest room?
It’s a long time since I was in there but i don’t remember one room being so big
Squiggs
TS Team
I would have thought that main room has a reasonable capacity to it. Given that, I believe it was the entire space dedicated to the restaurant during that era.
I don't think it was much smaller than the space my venue used to use for 70 person weddings (and even then I think our capacity was set by fire restrictions, rather than the number of seats we could have accommodated.)
I don't think it was much smaller than the space my venue used to use for 70 person weddings (and even then I think our capacity was set by fire restrictions, rather than the number of seats we could have accommodated.)
Dave
TS Founding Member
I would have thought that main room has a reasonable capacity to it. Given that, I believe it was the entire space dedicated to the restaurant during that era.
I don't think it was much smaller than the space my venue used to use for 70 person weddings (and even then I think our capacity was set by fire restrictions, rather than the number of seats we could have accommodated.)
I remember it being a bit of a non uniform space however, but I really could be wrong as the last time I was in there I was with you and we still worked on the “other site”
