Secret Weapon
TS Member
I found it strange that AT decided to build a ride that combined fire with wood - especially in light of the then-ongoing Smiler crash lawsuit, and concerns over the safety of rides at AT in general.If the park built Wicker Man because they wanted good publicity post-Smiler, why on Earth would they pick to build a ride type notoriously rejected for years on the grounds of it being perceived as unsafe by the broad populace in a period when the park was desperately trying to regain the public’s trust on safety?
P.S. This might sound like a very strange analogy, but John Wardley reminds me a bit of Hazel Savage (the police officer who investigated the serial killer Fred West); Hazel (correctly) deduced that he had murdered and buried his daughter, but her fellow officers thought that she was insane to actually excavate his house on the basis of a mere rumour / hunch – but, out of respect to her tenure, they agreed to her request (and she was proven to be right).
Likewise: John Wardley fought for years to have a wooden rollercoaster built at AT or Thorpe Park – in the face of overwhelming opposition – but, eventually, AT caved and - perhaps out of respect to his long track record - finally built one (the only part that I am unclear on is why they waited until after he retired before finally building one?).
