- News all the latest
- Theme Park explore the park
- Resort tour the resort
- Future looking forward
- History looking back
- Community and meetups
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks. - Thread starter Craig
- Start date
- Favourite Ride
- Stardust Racers
- Favourite Ride
- Voltron Nevera
- Favourite Ride
- Ug Bugs
- Favourite Ride
- Ug Bugs
- Favourite Ride
- VelociCoaster (Islands of Adventure)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
2026: General Discussion
Secret Weapon
TS Member
I don't think it was called Blade until it was relocated to Forbidden Valley in 1997 (to make way for Oblivion, I think)Couldnt for the life of me remember it was called Blade![]()
I think it was originally just called Pirate Ship when it was in the area that is now X-Sector ?
When I visited last year, it was just an empty pit. From the top of Toxicator (on one side), you could clearly see into it. You could kind of see into it by walking along the vending machine path as wellWhats currently in the area that the pirate ship was since its removal?
Benjsh
TS Member
To be honest FV has 4 attractions so as nice it would be to have a permanent replacement for Blade.....I think there's a far greater need for a flat ride to be added to X Sector or Dark Forest first.
Nemmy, Galactica, Toxicator and Sub Terra is definitely enough for now.
Nemmy, Galactica, Toxicator and Sub Terra is definitely enough for now.
flyingguitar
TS Member
It may be, isn't it sometimes stored inside the tunnel during maitanenceThe train isn't even on the track yet...
The Monorail and Skyride are testing now though so closed season must nearby be over![]()
Bowser
TS Member
To be honest FV has 4 attractions so as nice it would be to have a permanent replacement for Blade.....I think there's a far greater need for a flat ride to be added to X Sector or Dark Forest first.
Nemmy, Galactica, Toxicator and Sub Terra is definitely enough for now.
Without it, FV remains the 1.4m exclusion zone.
So does X Sector but at least there are options in the vicinity.
Secret Weapon
TS Member
They probably think that the arcade is good enough for kids - except that nobody uses arcades anymore
The Curse is somewhat nearby, but probably still too far away to be considered a true part of Forbidden Valley
Incidentally: was The Blade moved to FV in order to give kids something to ride, or was it literally just to make room for Oblivion over in X-Sector?
Wasn't there already a small flat ride in Forbidden Valley at the time, where Sub-Terra now is?
The Curse is somewhat nearby, but probably still too far away to be considered a true part of Forbidden Valley
Incidentally: was The Blade moved to FV in order to give kids something to ride, or was it literally just to make room for Oblivion over in X-Sector?
Wasn't there already a small flat ride in Forbidden Valley at the time, where Sub-Terra now is?
Last edited:
Bowser
TS Member
They are desperate for any ride between 1.1 to 1.3 in a lot of areas. Its a litte bit silly how some kid can ride Hyperia and Icon but not Rita. I know its based on restraints but still.
Its not always based on that as lots of the same restraints from the same manufacturers have lower height restrictions around the world. Some retrospectively lowered too.
Skyscraper
TS Member
I think it's actually more based on the ride forces; children are affected by higher forces more than adults (this is why Toxicator has a strict 10+ age requirement).They are desperate for any ride between 1.1 to 1.3 in a lot of areas. Its a litte bit silly how some kid can ride Hyperia and Icon but not Rita. I know its based on restraints but still.
Last edited:
Secret Weapon
TS Member
I didn't know that; I wonder how AT enforce this if they see a child who is tall enough, but appears to be 9 years old or below?this is why Toxicator has a strict 10+ age requirement
Bowser
TS Member
It's actually more based on the ride forces; children are affected by higher forces more than adults (this is why Toxicator has a strict 10+ age requirement).
I don’t even think it’s that in the UK. There are rides with higher forces yet lower height restrictions around the world (and also Hyperia), Merlin simply have no interest in amending existing restrictions, especially if they can’t be rounded up on the metric system (eg B&Ms in many other countries are often 1.32m or 1.37m which is 54 inches).
Toxicator being new is presumably legitimately based on height for the restraints and forces as the 1.4m is enforced globally as far as i know!
Benzin
TS Member
The Curse is somewhat nearby, but probably still too far away to be considered a true part of Forbidden Valley
Alty Mans is not suitable for my 3 year old.
Blade would be. Fortunately we can still get away with her being just as engaged watching the bigger rides than going on them.
But the point is that 3 areas of the park NEED support attractions that provide something for those not tall enough for the big stuff. Particularly those too old for CBeebies.
It's actually more based on the ride forces; children are affected by higher forces more than adults (this is why Toxicator has a strict 10+ age requirement).
It's actually more based on insurance companies assessments of overall risks.
GooseOnTheLoose
TS Member
Challenge 25.I didn't know that; I wonder how AT enforce this if they see a child who is tall enough, but appears to be 9 years old or below?
No ID? No ride.
It's mostly based on the assessment of risk by the insurance company, within the parameters decided by the manufacturer.It's actually more based on the ride forces; children are affected by higher forces more than adults (this is why Toxicator has a strict 10+ age requirement).
Edit, beaten by @rob666.
Secret Weapon
TS Member
I never understood this, as Britain traditionally used the imperial system, whereas continental Europe pioneered the metric system - but yet it appears to be the other way around with rollercoasters?Merlin simply have no interest in amending existing restrictions, especially if they can’t be rounded up on the metric system (eg B&Ms in many other countries are often 1.32m or 1.37m which is 54 inches).
GooseOnTheLoose
TS Member
Coaster manufacturing, for most of its history, has primarily been focused on the US market (who use imperial measurements).I never understood this, as Britain traditionally used the imperial system, whereas continental Europe pioneered the metric system - but yet it appears to be the other way around with rollercoasters?
Bowser
TS Member
I never understood this, as Britain traditionally used the imperial system, whereas continental Europe pioneered the metric system - but yet it appears to be the other way around with rollercoasters?
Europe is very much metric, they’re just not wedded to 10cm increments like we are.
Blackpool is i believe the only major UK park that deviates from this.
Matt N
TS Member
I seem to remember someone saying that this is due to Blackpool previously having height restrictions in imperial and then converting them to metric on many of the older rides.Blackpool is i believe the only major UK park that deviates from this.
A given number of feet and inches (or just inches if you’re American) won’t necessarily convert neatly into a number rounded to the nearest 10cm.
Secret Weapon
TS Member
I love the fact that Merlin think that the public are a bunch of thickos who couldn't possibly comprehend 2 decimal places - even though prices in Britain are listed in pounds and pence, and thus often use 2 decimal places! (Ditto for Europe and the USA, etc)Europe is very much metric, they’re just not wedded to 10cm increments like we are.
Most people still give their height in feet and inches AFAIK, anyway!
