• ℹ️ Heads up...

    This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks.

Chessington World of Adventures Resort

It puts into perspective how big this is for Chessington, this must have been a hard sought after IP, and with a global fan base, and Chessington being in London, this really could have a global reach, certainly the right IP to get people wanting to combine it with a Universal trip when that opens.
 
JAperson said:
It puts into perspective how big this is for Chessington, this must have been a hard sought after IP, and with a global fan base, and Chessington being in London, this really could have a global reach, certainly the right IP to get people wanting to combine it with a Universal trip when that opens.
Click to expand...
As long as they do it justice. The didn’t do Jumanji justice in my eyes.

Does strike me as mildly entertaining that two IPs that have had Jack Black as a leading star are coming.
 
I think this could be a big success for Chessington.

Certainly, the concept art looks quite good if they manage to pull it off! And I can't imagine a top-dollar IP like Minecraft will let Merlin scrimp...
 
Glen_Belt_77 said:
Towers dropped the ball.... Or the block
Click to expand...
Not too sure I agree,

I think for 2 reasons:

1. This land really needs flat open land for all of the show building, themeing, etc (assuming it is done properly) something which is at a premium at towers, and I doubt much of the available places would do it as much justice.

2. Placing a globally recognised IP in the middle of nowhere, with no public transit links when a massive brand is moving next to 3 of their parks would probably not be the best move (especially consider chessinton has better transit links)

Also I wouldn't really want the IP at AT
 
I agree if it looks rubbish they really will be harshly judged. They have to get this right if they want Chessington to be that accompanying park.
 
flyingguitar said:
Not too sure I agree,

I think for 2 reasons:

1. This land really needs flat open land for all of the show building, themeing, etc (assuming it is done properly) something which is at a premium at towers, and I doubt much of the available places would do it as much justice.

2. Placing a globally recognised IP in the middle of nowhere, with no public transit links when a massive brand is moving next to 3 of their parks would probably not be the best move (especially consider chessinton has better transit links)

Also I wouldn't really want the IP at AT
Click to expand...
Sorry for the double post, but I have to agree with this. Towers needs to keep its own identity, with it thriving off its own themes and brands, Chessington being the better linked park makes sense to use for this kind of thing. It's sensible business.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top