STEJENT
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
I have to disagree.We need to encourage people to consume fewer calories, especially the dead ones in soft drinks.
It's not "relentless curtailing of personal choices", you can still choose sugar, and pay more in most instances.
Our population, national and worldwide, is getting fatter and fatter, sad fact.
Obesity is now a massive problem for the NHS...should we just stand by and let the nation get even more obese?
Government needs to do something to make the nation healthier, wouldn't you agree.
Never seen so many oversize people in theme parks, the problem is getting worse, very quickly.
There are many establishments where the option to buy sugary drinks has been removed entirely. KFC for example now only serve Pepsi Max. I went to a restaurant in Liverpool where I asked for a coke and was told they only do diet, or zero.
All that while serving lashings of deep fried fatty, carb heavy food?
The government could do anything to help the situation, but as usual, they add a tax on to it.
Let's also not forget the impact it has on other areas, such as Lucozade reducing their sugar content and filling it with sweeteners, and the impact this has had on diabetics who used to use Lucozade to quickly combat a hypoglycaemic episode.
If that isn't curtailing, then I don't know what is.
I don't think coca-cola will be reducing their sugar content as they already offer diet and zero sugar variants.It's a decision by Coca-Cola, more than Alton Towers or Merlin, and is part of Coke's long term strategy to remove and reduce sugar in their drinks offering.
This article is a little dated, from 2019, but it reports on the direction that Coca-Cola is taking to offer "healthier" options in Freestyle machine.
![]()
Coca-Cola cuts back on sugar with bubbler beverages
Shifting consumer taste is causing major beverage companies to adapt, make ‘healthy’ drinks taste better and be more accessible. Coca-Cola is using its Freestyle machines and new bubbler dispensers to highlight its ‘craft, elevated’ drinks in the market.www.beveragedaily.com
I'd suggest that this is part of a strategy to self-regulate, lest the government decide to do it for them.
Edit: It's also worth highlighting that the sugar tax, in the UK, is paid by the manufacturer. It's not paid by the consumer and it's not paid by the retailer. Quite simply Coca-Cola have removed the options slowly over the years to pay less tax.
The UK sugar tax, officially called the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL), has a two-tiered system:
Exemptions
- Tier 1: Drinks with 5 to 8 grams of sugar per 100ml - Taxed at 18 pence per liter
- Tier 2: Drinks with more than 8 grams of sugar per 100ml - Taxed at 24 pence per liter
- Drinks with less than 5 grams of sugar per 100ml are exempt.
- Pure fruit juices.
I think the majority of people are too young to remember this, but they tried changing the recipe to coke in the 80's and it didn't go down well, and they quickly backpedaled.
Pepsi have reduced their sugar content in the regular drink, and it tastes awful now, so it's another brand I have parted ways with.
Ribera did the same, and I no longer buy that either.
I guess the tax/levy is working in some ways, but not in any way that makes a big difference for me, other than saving me money. I don't adore coca-cola, so I drink a lot less fizzy drinks at home now and tend to stick to water, hot drinks, and cordial at home these days, with the occasional glass of orange juice.