Tried Duel with me and 2 of my friends today we thought it was really impressive and loved the whole experience, maybe we haven't tried enough of other class ghost train kind of rides but I can't see why people think it's so flawed.
Damn would have never of guessed they had a spinning tunnel I've done one ghost train which had one and I loved that part, but honestly I thought duel was a 8/10 for the experienceEven as someone who never experienced the Haunted House, I have memory of plenty of effects which are now long broken such as the spinning tunnel.
Well said! A few years ago we visited with my partner in a wheelchair because she was waiting for a knee operation. Should could walk for short distances but standing in a queue was a definite no. I don't remember much about ride accessibility other than using the lift on Rita and The Smiler when the staff asked if she could walk in the event of an evacuation (which she could - as it was the standing around in queues that caused the pain for her). We used the lift to the station and that was great.Given there was no wheelchair access allowed last year (an absolute pain in of itself, Towers is hard enough to navigate with a wheelchair), the changes are naturally a positive point in terms of accessibility.
The tilted room was a problem for those who can transfer as we had to last Halloween. Walking in a straight line is hard enough, so walking on a tilted floor added further complications. So in order to allow wheelchair access it HAD to go.
What other options were there for the park? Re-routing the existing exit would've been challenging given the location of everything. And closing the shop would've equally got as much negative feedback. So that's out.
They could've done a Hex and used the fire exit that leads directly into the station. However that would look terrible as well as the station would be bathed in natural light constantly, and since everyone is complaining about the atmosphere bring ruined already it stands that this would also not be a suitable alternative (Hex's fire exit is so ridiculous).
So the simplest option is to revamp the existing queue. Could they have flattened the current queue line? That is perhaps the one question I have for them. A re-route seemed a bit of a strange reaction to this problem. But if the feedback from the incident last year suggested this was the best case then without internal involvement it's hard to say what was ideal in this case. Perhaps the width of the queue wouldn't have been sufficient?
What's telling here is that some responses are incredibly ableist in view. Making queuelines accessible is the way forward if we want to attempt to reduce the current issue of RAP, and unfortunately retrofitting these will come at a cost. I think allowing wheelchair users to access the ride through the normal queue (rather than through the backdoor that some would seemingly prefer so THEIR experience isn't marred) somewhat outweighs a queue that people basically walk through anyway.
I would suggest those that have an issue with the implementation try and visit a few places in a wheelchair.
Given there was no wheelchair access allowed last year (an absolute pain in of itself, Towers is hard enough to navigate with a wheelchair), the changes are naturally a positive point in terms of accessibility.
The tilted room was a problem for those who can transfer as we had to last Halloween. Walking in a straight line is hard enough, so walking on a tilted floor added further complications. So in order to allow wheelchair access it HAD to go.
What other options were there for the park? Re-routing the existing exit would've been challenging given the location of everything. And closing the shop would've equally got as much negative feedback. So that's out.
They could've done a Hex and used the fire exit that leads directly into the station. However that would look terrible as well as the station would be bathed in natural light constantly, and since everyone is complaining about the atmosphere bring ruined already it stands that this would also not be a suitable alternative (Hex's fire exit is so ridiculous).
So the simplest option is to revamp the existing queue. Could they have flattened the current queue line? That is perhaps the one question I have for them. A re-route seemed a bit of a strange reaction to this problem. But if the feedback from the incident last year suggested this was the best case then without internal involvement it's hard to say what was ideal in this case. Perhaps the width of the queue wouldn't have been sufficient?
What's telling here is that some responses are incredibly ableist in view. Making queuelines accessible is the way forward if we want to attempt to reduce the current issue of RAP, and unfortunately retrofitting these will come at a cost. I think allowing wheelchair users to access the ride through the normal queue (rather than through the backdoor that some would seemingly prefer so THEIR experience isn't marred) somewhat outweighs a queue that people basically walk through anyway.
I would suggest those that have an issue with the implementation try and visit a few places in a wheelchair.
Would need to have a very wide outer edge for wheelchairs so probably not possible.Couldn't they have the tilted floor but with the outer edge levelled off?
It isn't ableist, accessibility is a big part of my job, this is just poor design.What's telling here is that some responses are incredibly ableist in view. Making queuelines accessible is the way forward
And the front steps outside.Duel was already accessible, just not that one scene due to the nature of the tilted floor. The
Thats the original accessible route, it bypasses the preshow to go to the station.I'm sure when I go down the exit ramp there is a door on the right hand side (before turning back towards the shop). Where does that lead?
What's telling here is that some responses are incredibly ableist in view.
Agreed. The fact that they have made the preshow wheelchair accessible is fantastic, but the way they have done it isn't great.Throwing accusations about of ...ists and ...isms about for not agreeing with what the park have done is pretty pathetic and unfair.
They have done a good thing in a bad way, when there are lots of other ways to achieve their goal. No one is arguing for continued access issues for anyone, but it's not wrong or unreasonable of people to want them to have chosen a different solution.