Ahh I see. Still, they should at least get the positions right, makes it seem worse than it is...I think it means as the system sensed the train had not made it to the second hill.
That... is brilliant!Daily Sieg Heil
I couldn't even bring myself to click on the link and give the Daily Sieg Heil another hit. Just hovering over the URL said enough for me!
If I was in the booth and the engineer who's taken over the malfunction told me to press 'button X' I wouldn't even question it. I'd be going straight to HR if I was punished for it.If this is true then I can't really understand why the people who allowed this accident are still working at AT, investigation pending or no. Surely they would have suspended them.
I hope the "different roles" they've been given only involve enough responsibility as mopping the toilet floors..
Exactly, they most probably did know. Given that the block had kicked in and stopped the ride for 10 minutes, in that time they must have known it had stalled. My money's still on "tried to reverse the train back down the lift for evac, but didn't quite put it in reverse"I think the real question is not "who's to blame", but rather, "how the hell did they not know the train had stalled?"
I hope the "different roles" they've been given only involve enough responsibility as mopping the toilet floors..
I believe the procedure is to reverse the train down the lift, that way it's a much safer evac than one at height and on an incline. It's the only ride in the world, that I'm aware of, where that is a possibility. That being said, it would seem a major flaw in the blocking logic if it allowed the vehicle to be advanced into the next block by accident, or that it requires putting into a fully manual mode to carry out a lift hill evac.That's possible, but do they reverse the first lift, or just use the stairs like a normal coaster?
(Psst, it means the member is online)