Swanscombe Development LLP which is itself up for sale. LRCH is to all intents and purposes asset-less.Who owns the land? I guess that is/was the most important thing.
Swanscombe Development LLP which is itself up for sale. LRCH is to all intents and purposes asset-less.Who owns the land? I guess that is/was the most important thing.
If will be interesting to see if the environmental nutters have the same level of anger when a big developer wants to stick a load of fancy apartments thereSwanscombe Development LLP which is itself up for sale. LRCH is to all intents and purposes asset-less.
I’m not sure it’s necessarily fair to call them “environmental nutters”. There clearly is biodiversity that Natural England saw fit to protect on the site, hence its designation as an SSSI.If will be interesting to see if the environmental nutters have the same level of anger when a big developer wants to stick a load of fancy apartments there
There were huge site suitability questions even ignoring the SSSI designation.If will be interesting to see if the environmental nutters have the same level of anger when a big developer wants to stick a load of fancy apartments there
The quote from the Times article did make me laugh though:I’m not sure it’s necessarily fair to call them “environmental nutters”. There clearly is biodiversity that Natural England saw fit to protect on the site, hence its designation as an SSSI.
An interesting comparison is Universal’s proposal in Bedford, a proposal by an established theme park company in a less contentious location. That has been known about for a year and has no known environmental concerns; heck, it has even had environmentally-minded bodies express approval of the proposal.
So an industrial use in the past makes it unsuitable for any further development?Natural England said the industrial use had left a landscape providing “ideal conditions for a unique variety of wildlife,” including plants such as the divided sedge and the slender hare’s-ear.
LRCH has also been told to pay costs to Merlin Entertainments, a rival theme park operator and the company behind the likes of Chessington World of Adventures and Thorpe Park. It had opposed the plans.
Sooooo, this thread can be locked now, I guess?![]()
So it seems Merlin will be able to pay off those debts thanks to this then? Huh, wonder if that money might help get the Galactica retheme resurrected again?Merlin even managed to get themselves on the creditors list somehow.![]()
No chance any creditors see a penny!So it seems Merlin will be able to pay off those debts thanks to this then? Huh, wonder if that money might help get the Galactica retheme resurrected again?![]()
At least they have the legacy of taking us on the greatest ride of all.
Lmao, so London Resort might have saved us from a Ghostbusters retheme of Duel?Kent Online’s now got hold of some of the unreleased concept art - looks like the plan was for a Ghostbusters dark ride and a Paddington area with funfair-style rides and a meet-and-greet:
![]()
Exclusive: Unseen images of planned London Resort attractions
After the death of the £2.5bn London Resort project, exclusive images of planned attractions at the site are revealed as conservationists celebrate.www.kentonline.co.uk