He was the Chief executive though...although other directors and executives were there, he held ultimate responsibility as the top executive officer.
The responsibility for the accident does indeed come down to him in my eyes.
He was gaffer, he sets the rules that others, including managers, work by.
The accident was on his watch, he should take the blame within the group.
Don't get me wrong, this is true, especially given that the incident was easily avoidable.
Still think it's worth pointing out that when
criticizing Merlin around that time period; more attention should of been paid to Blackstone (who interestingly were in the process of selling off their historical shares around the time of the incident, about 2 years after Merlin was floated), valueact, and CPPIB.
All of those entities had more sway over Merlin company policy than Varney ever did, as an individual. A lot of us back in the day (I'm guilty of this) acted as if Varney was sitting on a chair stroking a cat in a dark room plotting all the cutbacks, cautiousness and lack of investment.
And in the context of Smiler crash, there is an alternative argument. Paying staff adequately, and ensuring there are resources and knowledge to ensure sufficient training would of been far easier had more operational expenditure been directed at Merlin parks. Had expenditure been higher in those areas, we can speculate on whether the accident would of happened. I think on that basis it's reasonable to point the blame at the big dogs as well as Varney.
But equally, had Varney been more attentive of the operations within the business, Smiler crash probably wouldn't of happened. Apparently tiny small miscommunication mistakes caused the crash after all. Things that a CEO should have control over, all things considered.
So I do get your point , either way.
As far as major accidents are concerned, Merlin does have one of the best track records in the industry, so I don’t know if it’d be fair to withhold a knighthood based on The Smiler accident. Certainly, there are companies like Six Flags which seem to have a worse track record.
You raise some good points, but I'm not sure I follow through with this particular point. Just because another company has more incidents of gross negligence doesn't absolve the other of wrongdoing. Even one gigantic mistake is a gigantic mistake in and of itself.