Merlin Entertainments: General Discussion

[NuttySquirrel]

...and every opinion is sacred, but Merlin do not have a theme park monopoly in this country, there are at least a dozen competitors in this small nation of ours.
A competetive market, with lots of options to avoid Merlin if you choose.

I would struggle to describe the UK theme park industry as a "competitive market". There aren't any other parks in this country I would classify in the same category as any of the Merlin parks in terms of ride line-up, theming and peripherals (on site hotels, water parks etc). Blackpool has some good classic coasters but theming is lacklustre and its seaside holiday sheen has long faded. Flamingoland has a lot of coasters but in my opinion the hardware is B-grade, with their "signature" attraction just a clone of an old ride at Thorpe Park. Paultons had the potential to start punching above their weight but chose to play it safe with a fairly standard Eurofighter. Merlin is the only group in the UK still daring to invest in cutting edge rides such as Hyperia and (if it ever materialises) Project Horizon.

Far too many parks in this country have abandoned the thrillseekers in favour of the family market. If you want to look for real competitors to Merlin you have to look further afield to mainland Europe.

 

[rob666]

But 90% of the UK theme park market simply doesn't go abroad to do theme parks.
There are dozens of uk parks, most small, but all competing against Merlin.
The market has a number of alternatives within the sector, they compete, realistically, and repeatedly.
Merlin mopped up the economy end of the scale with cheap passes off peak. but the market is still there, with a number of competitors.

 

[NuttySquirrel]

But 90% of the UK theme park market simply doesn't go abroad to do theme parks.
There are dozens of uk parks, most small, but all competing against Merlin.
The market has a number of alternatives within the sector, they compete, realistically, and repeatedly.
Merlin mopped up the economy end of the scale with cheap passes off peak. but the market is still there, with a number of competitors.

I think it depends how we are defining "competitors" here. Any leisure attraction could be considered a competitor to a theme park, in that you could choose to spend your money at a theme park or doing something completely different such as bowling or adventure golf. I was thinking however of direct competitors - attractions offering an equivalent experience - and of those I think we have very few indeed, possibly none in the strictest sense.

You are right that many people in the UK have no means to travel abroad to visit theme parks. This only makes the Merlin monopoly even more damaging to the industry.

 

[GooseOnTheLoose]

This only makes the Merlin monopoly even more damaging to the industry.

Aside from the fact that it's not a monopoly and doesn't come close to the definition of one.

A monopolist has so much power that they control the industry's price of the product, the servicing and production contracts around the product, and the consumer has no other choice.

Merlin doesn't have industry control over pricing. Entry prices have broadly stayed consistent for the past 20ish years of operations, increasing just under the inflation rate. Their product has got cheaper, not more expensive. Merlin's pricing also doesn't affect the pricing strategy of their competitors, with Paulton's, Blackpool and Drayton regularly being more expensive to visit than a Merlin park.

Merlin does not have exclusive contracts with suppliers, nor do they control how much that contract is worth. Other parks in the UK can, and do, go to the same attraction, food and beverage and entertainment providers as Merlin and pay the same price as everyone else. Merlin does not have purchasing power to bully their suppliers.

A monopoly means that you don't have another choice, there aren't any other parks one can visit. This isn't the same as not having any other parks of a similar and consistent high production quality.

Merlin isn't the only seller and there are close substitutes.

A monopoly ensures that there are high barriers to entry. Either the costs of starting up are too high, or government intervention makes it impossible, or the essential resources are controlled by the monopoly. Whilst there hasn't been a new park, of considerable note or size, opening in the UK during Merlin's existence, there have been expanding existing players and two new ones attempting to enter the market, with Universal and Puy Du Fou.

 

[rob666]

And further, if Merlin had a monopoly, a real one, do you think they would let the punters have season passes, let alone dirt cheap ones?

 

[Bowser]

I think it depends how we are defining "competitors" here. Any leisure attraction could be considered a competitor to a theme park, in that you could choose to spend your money at a theme park or doing something completely different such as bowling or adventure golf. I was thinking however of direct competitors - attractions offering an equivalent experience - and of those I think we have very few indeed, possibly none in the strictest sense.

You are right that many people in the UK have no means to travel abroad to visit theme parks. This only makes the Merlin monopoly even more damaging to the industry.

I think people are focusing on the dictionary definition of a monopoly when i expect the point being made is that Merlin dominate the UK theme park industry due to the multitude of attractions they own. It's not a picture we really see anywhere else in Europe and as a result (though of course not the only reason) they tend to have higher quality destinations whilst Merlin as a company benefit from competitors being unable to reach a comparable level, meaning they can maintain a lower standard.

Will Paultons get there? Other than Universal they're the only viable contender left imo but i expect they will always remain somewhat a niche park.

 

[GooseOnTheLoose]

I think people are focusing on the dictionary definition of a monopoly when i expect the point being made is that Merlin dominate the UK theme park industry due to the multitude of attractions they own.

In terms of pure visitor numbers alone, Merlin dominate the thrill end of UK attractions in the UK. Crucially, they still do not have a monopoly. They are also not the dominant operator in terms of locations.

Theme Parks

• Merlin Entertainments operates 4 UK theme parks: Alton Towers, Chessington World of Adventures, Thorpe Park and Legoland Windsor.
• Gulliver's operate 4 theme parks in the UK, equalling Merlin: Gulliver's Valley, Gulliver's World, Gulliver's Kingdom and Gulliver's Land.
• The Looping Group operate 21 leisure parks in Europe, they currently operate 3 in the UK: Drayton Manor Park & Zoo, West Midlands Safari Park and Pleasurewood Hills.
• There are many other single site, or duo site, operators.

Heritage Attractions

• Merlin Entertainments operates 1 castle, Warwick.
• English Heritage operates over 100 castles, forts, and defensive sites.
• National Trust operate 29 castles or forts.

Gateway / Midway attractions

• Merlin Entertainments operate 21 gateway / midway attractions in the UK: Madame Tussauds, London Eye, Shrek's Adventure Playground, Cadbury World, 2 x Legoland Discovery Centres, 4 x Dungeons, 11 x Sea Lifes.
• Escape Hunt operate 24 locations in the UK.
• Boom Battle Bar operate 30 locations in the UK.
• Mulligans operate 14 midway attractions in the UK.
• Hollywood Bowl operate 75 sites in the UK.
• Odeon operate 103 sites in the UK.

It's not a picture we really see anywhere else in Europe

• The Looping Group own and operate 10 parks in France alone, more than Merlin in the UK.
• Parques Reunidos operate 8 parks across Europe, all within Schengen.
• Compagnie des Alpes operate 9 theme parks across Europe, including 4 in France alone.

 

[Bowser]

I perhaps naively took it in good faith that people were discussing theme parks of a certain calibre rather than the likes of Gullivers which will not ever (nor are they trying to) compete at the higher level of the market in which Merlin operate. Perhaps there are equivalent borderline monopolies in the lower tiers.

Can't say i have an encyclopaedic knowledge of every European theme park but for the point being made you could perhaps cite Netherlands (Efteling, Walibi and Toverland), Germany (Europa, Phantasialand, Movie Park Germany, Legoland), France (DLP, Asterix, Puy du fou, Walibi, Futuroscope), Belgium (Plospa, Walibi, Bellewaerde) and Spain (Portaventura, Parque Warner, Isla Magica) as examples where the top parks are from a range of providers whilst the UK's top 4 are all Merlin. That's where i think the discussion point perception of them as a Monopoly stems from rather than legal definitions.

That was my interpretation of the conversation anyway. I think the non theme park attractions are only relevant in the sense that they bolster Merlins grip on the market through the value of the MAP.