GooseOnTheLoose
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Ug Bugs
With how quickly this chat has been moving, it's likely that you missed the previous discussion this.Seeing this reminded me I need to sort out Access Card for Mrs for our trip to Efteling.
Took seconds because it's an automated AI. Granted it has also randomly decided she can't go on Baron (but everything else is fine?) so all hail our robot overlords.
But the reality is all it took was answering a number of questions as yes or no. No evidence provided. Our trip to Europa last year was literally showing the Access Card at rides and that was accepted by the staff. One guesses (and has assumed for a number of years) that our continental cousins are just a bit more respectful about the situations surrounding accessibility. Possibly because their laws are a bit behind in the matter. But even beforehand all we showed was a doctors note and as soon as staff saw MS on there was instant approval.
As for one shots the only park I've seen do it is Paultons. Also believe that it is only relevant for ambulant disabled as we could re-ride Storm Chaser on our last visit. Might be put to the test more next time since we'll be forced into Pig Land.
Liseberg even allowed a re-ride before moving on!
The primary difference with our European counterparts is that they accept Nimbus' Access Card alongside a whole ranger of other identification. They're not tied into exclusivity.
The majority of UK parks (including Paultons Park) now will only accept Nimbus' accreditation and nothing else.
Although you're right that Disneyland Paris will accept an Access Card, the comparison you've drawn is a misleading one, as it misses the distinction that lies at the heart of the entire debacle.
It's a difference between using something as evidence versus mandating it as an exclusive gatekeeper.
At Disneyland Paris, the Access Card is treated as one piece in a portfolio of acceptable evidence. A visitor can present a Blue Badge, a DLA / PIP letter, or a relevant national disability card from their home country. The park's own trained Cast Members then assess that evidence and issue their own internal Priority Card. It is an in house system that accepts a variety of proofs.
Merlin don't simply accept the Nimbus card. It's the sole and mandatory gateway to the RAP system.
You can, of course, waddle up to Guest Services with your Blue Badge and a consultant's letter thick enough to stop a door, and they will very politely grant you a carer ticket. But for the Ride Access Pass itself? Nimbus assessment or bust.
It's more than an administrative difference, being more akin to a fundamental philosophical and commercial one.
The Disney model is a non-commercial, in house assessment of various proofs. The Merlin model forces every single applicant into the sales funnel of a for profit, third party company whose entire business model, as we have already established, is predicated on the volume of cards it issues.
One system accepts the Access Card as a valid form of ID. The other makes it a compulsory purchase.
