Jonathan said:
Fredward said:
Jonathan said:
So if one of your children got injured when walking to or from school because of snow and ice, you wouldn't care? That's a rather sad thing, if I'm honest.
Did he mention that? Did he even say anything to suggest that? Sorry to call you out in this occasion, but you are grossly twisting his point of view for no reason and I don't see how it was necessary. I'm sure he would care if his child got injured on the way to school.
That's a fair point, Matt, but I was getting the impression that money seemed more important than child welfare.
Again I fail to see him saying or implied that either? He said he was grumpy for losing a days pay? Wouldn't you be, especially if you need every penny you can get looking after kids. He never said it was more important.
I'm not saying I fully agree with his point of view, but I can understand why some would think that way, if I can get into work can't the teachers? Frustration then caused from having to drive back in these conditions to look after children, would give the parent a sour taste on their opinion on snow days.
The thing is Jon, since you don't have kids, nor work a full time job. You can't fully understand where he is coming from. I remember when I was to young to look after myself and had snowdays, I had two choices, go round a friends house, or have to sit with my parents at work (they own their own business) especially January being a ridiculously busy time for accountants.
You make these assumptions and wild ideas with little or no knowledge of his point of view. (Neither do I, but i'm not making wild assumptions of him caring more for money then his kids and not caring about their safety)
Some people need to work... they can't afford a day off, so after going through all the effort to get to work, just to be forced to pick up their kid has to be a kick in the teeth.
Again, I don't have this point of view 100% but I can respect both sides of the argument, hence why I'm making this point.