• ℹ️ Heads up...

    This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks.

Skyride General Discussion

venny said:
That’s exactly my point. Again, assuming it is a decision based on their capabilities rather than costs, the fact they cannot run the thing for more than 5 hours is an indictment of their operational capacity.
Click to expand...

Yeah I wasn’t particularly disagreeing with that sentiment, I was more suggesting that there does seem to be some actual competence in the management these days.

My understanding is it takes 3 years to become fully signed off as a techy at Towers these days so I think it’s going to be a slow journey.
 
Dave said:
Yeah I wasn’t particularly disagreeing with that sentiment, I was more suggesting that there does seem to be some actual competence in the management these days.

My understanding is it takes 3 years to become fully signed off as a techy at Towers these days so I think it’s going to be a slow journey.
Click to expand...
Since the Smiler incident, they did become serious with safety and signing off rides perhaps at a cost of why we have the staggered openings to this day.

Without what happened and how these rides bring run into the ground at Merlin parks constantly, the scary thing is we might have had a Smiler like incident one way or the other either with that or some other ride that could have been far worse so as it pains me to say it...that whole situation might have been a necessary evil for better ride safety at Merlin parks, even if it meant problems elsewhere like Skyride being out for so long.
 
I don’t think Merlin have ever scrimped on safety-critical ride maintenance.

You can say a lot of things about Merlin, but one thing I could personally never have said, before Smiler or after, is that I have ever felt unsafe at any of the parks or that any of the rides have ever felt improperly maintained from a safety standpoint. I have never felt anything but completely safe at a Merlin park, or any park for that matter.

The Smiler incident was a very, very unfortunate set of circumstances that did expose clear weaknesses in the human side of Merlin’s safety policies, but that is not to say that the parks were unsafe before. Just because something could be made safer, that is not to say that it is unsafe. The Smiler crash was a definite tragedy that the parks learned from and rightly changed policy following, but that is not to say that an incident like that was a guaranteed occurrence under the previous safety paradigm. It was still a once-in-a-billion accident that occurred due to a perfect storm of circumstances.
 
The Smiler was a Swiss Cheese style incident, where you have to have the gaps in procedure line up perfectly to cause an incident. The Skyride (like other Merlin rides to best of knowledge) has steps taken to reduce such a thing happening anyway. Not operating at night means the opportunity for a night evac gone wrong is gone for example, as is not operating at high winds prevents a gondola hitting a pylon as has been posted from a previous incident I believe in Talbot St.
 
Jb85 said:
@QTXAdsy i think it’s stretching to say without these measures we may of had another incident or worse. The Smiler incident- even with the procedures them was a one in a billion
Click to expand...
The incident was completely avoidable and a result of human error. I don't remember whether the operating manual was followed - it was an absolutely foreseeable situation.
 
Smiley said:
The incident was completely avoidable and a result of human error. I don't remember whether the operating manual was followed - it was an absolutely foreseeable situation.
Click to expand...

As many have said and I think even the investigation said. The incident was a perfect storm of events. This had absolutely nothing to do with the safety of the rides as was intimated in the original post.
 
Jb85 said:
As many have said and I think even the investigation said. The incident was a perfect storm of events. This had absolutely nothing to do with the safety of the rides as was intimated in the original post.
Click to expand...
The safety of the ride is without question. As for "a perfect storm", no - sorry. It was a simple case of not knowing how many cars were on the track. A very simple avoidable accident.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top