I have been talking about the issue with weather, people have been talking about how bad it is when it really isn't that much of a problem, I don't see it down due to weather too often
I was running simulation and software validation on Sparc 10s as far back as 1994. Also an recognised expert @ ETSI for telecoms simulation, testing and validation. Tested/validated the most important software/hardware modules on satellites, that AFAIK are still working today, 20 years later in zero gravity travelling a bit faster than Hyperia! Not CFD, but not trivial. Perhaps that's why telecoms systems have MTBF measured in decades. An i9 with a GPU for 10 mins isn't exactly what I was thinking of - maybe 100 or 1000 running for weeks/months
Like I said, you just rent your required compute from AWS or similar.Not really sure why you can't do SCADA over wi-fi, 5G or microwave if you don't want to lay fibre.
simulating software is quite easy I am not sure on what you have simulated so won't really comment further but considering how you have been going on as if simulations would have caught this, I am not sure they are that similar to the more engineering based simulations, when you are taught about simulations you are told that these are estimations based on inputs.I was running simulation and software validation on Sparc 10s as far back as 1994. Also an recognised expert @ ETSI for telecoms simulation, testing and validation. Tested/validated the most important software/hardware modules on satellites, that AFAIK are still working today, 20 years later in zero gravity travelling a bit faster than Hyperia! Not CFD, but not trivial. Perhaps that's why telecoms systems have MTBF measured in decades. An i9 with a GPU for 10 mins isn't exactly what I was thinking of - maybe 100 or 1000 running for weeks/months
no it isn't cutting edge, but I was trying to say about how costly and expensive it can be, that was an EXTREMLY simplified model, you are also missing my original point of the fact that there are assumptions to be made. also you can say about how 1 simulation won't cost much (even though it probably would cost quite a bit, there are cloud computing simulation software and it costs about £3-6 to get back one very basic simulation (an FEA)) but when designing parts, this simulation may have to be run hundreds of times, you can easily see 3,000,000 elements+ running with small time steps to calculate certain parts, which over low time steps can easily make extreme compute requirements
Stengel turn.
Not pointing the finger at any staff, as all the staff I encountered were super helpful!Well in this country we're innocent until proven otherwise. Perhaps they got dropped on the floor, then put in another bin by mistake when seen. Maybe if that happened another rider thought "Wow - free sunnies". Or maybe they'll turn up today! As said all staff were super helpful, so most likely a genuine mistake (and easy to mis-lay a pair of black glasses in a dark area).
Maybe get a glasses strap then you won't need to hand them in? I wear one when at parks for glasses (as opposed to sun glasses) and only on Rita was I asked to remove them until I said I had a strap on at which point they were ok. Usually on Rita I see the ride op point at me from the op cabin when the host is at my row then see a thumbs up from the host back to the op.So rode SAW today: handed in a baseball cap containing 2 mobile phones (Pixel 9 and S22) and some Oakley sunglasses. Came back without the sunglasses - staff couldn't find them.... Anyone had a similar experience??
Hopefully they'll turn up, but it's a bit strange that they got mislaid whilst the "traceable" phones were returned. They are only £150, but now I have to go and buy a new pair. I could have got unlimited FP for that money
I mean how are they supposed to react to that? I think the sheer awkwardness of retrieving that article put them off. Or maybe they thought it was secure enough.
I did wonder if anyone would pick up on how I worded that!
