On a similar note, there are also calls from Labour for Liz Truss to lose the Tory whip after she attended a right-wing conference in the USA and claimed that she was “sabotaged” by “the deep state”: https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/liz-trus...unak-to-strip-former-pm-of-conservative-whip/The beginning of the end for 30p Lee? Let’s bloody hope so.
Lee Anderson: MP suspended from Tory party over criticism of London mayor https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68392621
On a similar note, there are also calls from Labour for Liz Truss to lose the Tory whip after she attended a right-wing conference in the USA and claimed that she was “sabotaged” by “the deep state”: https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/liz-trus...unak-to-strip-former-pm-of-conservative-whip/
I can think of plenty of words to describe her - none of which can be said outside the Tavern. It's hardly surprising that she seems incapable of accepting the blame for screwing things up so badly, though.What a moron she is.
I can think of plenty of words to describe her - none of which can be said outside the Tavern. It's hardly surprising that she seems incapable of accepting the blame for screwing things up so badly, though.
At this rate, the culture war that the Conservative Party wants on a national level (i.e. during a forced election campaign) may end up being confined entirely to itself in a spectacular act of self-destruction.
It's why Sky News has always been impartial
Let me rephrase it then as striving to be impartial, as I agree human nature makes this impossible. But it's an excellent news service and I stand by that. Murdoch has always touted it as his greatest achievement actually, always been run at a loss and the only thing he's ever put out that didn't act as a mouthpiece for his own views.I lol'd.
True impartiality is basically imposible, but News International is not an impartial organisation in the slightest and that is very evident in their output. Nothing as brazen as GB News and the like I grant you, but Murdoch didn't set any of his empire up as a public service.
Let me rephrase it then as striving to be impartial, as I agree human nature makes this impossible. But it's an excellent news service and I stand by that. Murdoch has always touted it as his greatest achievement actually, always been run at a loss and the only thing he's ever put out that didn't act as a mouthpiece for his own views.
It also has nothing to do with News International. It's owned by Comcast and has been for the last few years.
Not quite, I understand what you're getting at but you're slightly off about the ownership.It was part of News International for decades
James Murdoch was, at one point, the overall managing director of BSkyB and there were accusations that he may have attempted to influence editorial decisions at Sky News. The extent of these accusations never went further than a request about what not to cover (influence by omission), rather than put a direct spin on things. Certainly not the same level of control that the Murdochs have/had on their news outlets. Although, again quite famously, Murdoch also wasn't allowed to influence or prevent the editorial independence of The Times / The Sunday Times, also by design.Attempts to influence
In the event that you become aware of an attempt by any employee, officer or director of the 21st Century Fox group or Sky outside the Sky News editorial function to influence matters within the authority of the Head of Sky News, you must report this immediately to the Head of Sky News and/or Ofcom. If you make a report to the Head of Sky News and/or Ofcom, you may request compensation from Sky
News for any costs you incur in making the report to the Head of Sky News and/or Ofcom. Any request for reimbursement may be made through Ofcom and you may also request that payment of your reimbursement from Sky News be made via Ofcom, for example where you wish to remain anonymous.