Matt N
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Shambhala (PortAventura Park)
I’ve said this before, but I honestly reckon we would have had a pretty good outcome for the London parks if Tussauds had sold Chessington when they bought Thorpe.
I know that would have relinquished their monopoly, but Chessington would surely have been seen as a pretty lucrative buy at the time (it was still pretty successful and would have had a pretty high asset value in 1998). But to benefit Tussauds/Merlin, whoever bought Chessington would have been hamstrung by its comparatively tight planning restrictions compared to Thorpe (meaning that they would have been unable to appeal to all markets effectively, and that they would have been unable to invest as much as they’d like). Tussauds/Merlin, on the other hand, would have been laughing, because Thorpe’s convenient location and loose planning restrictions could have given them the scope to make an “Alton Towers of the South” of sorts, where the park would have appealed to thrillseekers and families alike, particularly if Tussauds hadn’t had to tiptoe around Chessington when developing Thorpe.
I know that would have relinquished their monopoly, but Chessington would surely have been seen as a pretty lucrative buy at the time (it was still pretty successful and would have had a pretty high asset value in 1998). But to benefit Tussauds/Merlin, whoever bought Chessington would have been hamstrung by its comparatively tight planning restrictions compared to Thorpe (meaning that they would have been unable to appeal to all markets effectively, and that they would have been unable to invest as much as they’d like). Tussauds/Merlin, on the other hand, would have been laughing, because Thorpe’s convenient location and loose planning restrictions could have given them the scope to make an “Alton Towers of the South” of sorts, where the park would have appealed to thrillseekers and families alike, particularly if Tussauds hadn’t had to tiptoe around Chessington when developing Thorpe.