We are yet again wandering from the topic of virtual queue system and onto RAP eligibility I think.
However, I would just like to add that I think there are some assumptions and generalisations perhaps being made regarding people’s abilities and/or disabilities. There is no one size fits all answer, and let’s not loose sight of the fact that while some people may make use of RAP-type systems due to the social or physiological challenges of queueing in line (anxiety, claustrophobia, etc.), for others there may be other limiting factors such as the environmental element (narrow, steep, twisting queuelines, often with steps). That is not about not wanting to wait in line. That is about being physically unable to do so.
Attractions should be as accessible to as many people as possible, regardless of their physical or psychological condition or abilities. To suggest that a person or group should not be visiting a park due to things such as fatigue or other mobility impairments is simply reenforcing social inequality and discrimination.
Yes, the implimenation of some RAP systems may be flawed and open to abuse, but the general principle still stands I believe.
To bring us back to virtual queues, I think as has been said before, the implementation of such a system for RAP will hopefully help to provide a much more consistent, fairer experience which is less likely to be abused and negatively impact others.