Lightwater Valley

Genuinely wonder if this is mismanagement or a dying sector. My perception of piers is something that people in the 1930s did, and they are something of a relic.

The management of LWV has been horrendous, but it very much looks like so much of it has been because of cost cutting.

The ultimate was probably never going to run again regardless of who owned it, and the stresses and strains on the ride were probably eventually going to show either by killing someone or spectacularly breaking. So let's remember it for its glory days.

The rest of the park though? So much potential, so many corners cut, it's a wonder it has stayed open as long as it has. I always will have a soft spot for the place but a lack of any kind of investment since 2010 or possibly longer has meant I have had no interest in going back for at least the last decade.

I just hope upon hope whoever buys it sees the potential that's there and exploits it. It's beautiful (or the land is anyway), easy to get to, and has no real nearby competitors to its target market (the north east, not North Yorkshire, unlike flamingo land), and it is such a shame it has been so badly neglected for so long.

Sent from my Pixel 8 Pro using Tapatalk

shawnoc said:

Investment on the pier has been non existent. They got rid of Booster on whim without a replacement in mind. Hence the rush job to rent a small rocking boat ride as a replacement.
Maintenance on the pier had only been essential bit for h&s and it shows, the place is a mess. My customer the pier said to me a few weeks back that the pier may be up for sale along with Lightwater Valley.
Not sure who would buy the pier but I would hope it’s someone with deep pockets and sort out the last 5-10 years of under investment.

Click to expand...

Someone who can tear down Turbo

But would anyone actually replace it with another coaster. ???

I would say that the recent management at LV has been solid.
Moved away from the thrill market, and focused on young families.
Satisfaction has increased, attendance has turned the corner, the place is now run better than it has been in years.
But no stuff for thoosies.

And Blackpools Central and South piers are still very busy through the season, only the North one is dead.

rob666 said:

I would say that the recent management at LV has been solid.
Moved away from the thrill market, and focused on young families.
Satisfaction has increased, attendance has turned the corner, the place is now run better than it has been in years.
But no stuff for thoosies.

And Blackpools Central and South piers are still very busy through the season, only the North one is dead.

Click to expand...

The visitor numbers don't support this argument, they have been pretty stagnant. The whole period of thier ownership has been nothing more than an asset stripping excersise. Day to day operations may be good but if you have so few rides it's not much of an achievement

Quantum said:

The visitor numbers don't support this argument, they have been pretty stagnant. The whole period of thier ownership has been nothing more than an asset stripping excersise. Day to day operations may be good but if you have so few rides it's not much of an achievement

Click to expand...

So is that down to local park management or again the investors behind them. You could argue the same for Alton in some sense.

Local management seem to be doing a great job but have their hands tied - I suspect the same happened here

Quantum said:

The visitor numbers don't support this argument...

Click to expand...

Any actual figures out there?
I can't find any at all.

The park operations have shrunk, no monster coaster to manage, other large rides gone, together with the mechanics and ops staff gone.

Attendance remains static...therefore fewer costs, with the same income, and more satisfied customers in their new market...tweenies.
Makes good sense to me.

rob666 said:

I would say that the recent management at LV has been solid.
Moved away from the thrill market, and focused on young families.
Satisfaction has increased, attendance has turned the corner, the place is now run better than it has been in years.
But no stuff for thoosies.

And Blackpools Central and South piers are still very busy through the season, only the North one is dead.

Click to expand...

The decision to move away from the thrill market was by previous owners (who are responsible for the death of Flambards too)

I would say that with the thrill rides, Brighton Pier have tried to bring them back i.e. Rocket, although that wasn't successful (likely due to the issues with the coaster itself).

I did say recent, not current.
The reviews generally have been more positive in recent years.
Constant income, reduced ride costs after removal.

They have not gone back towards the thrill market in any way, it is for kiddie families in the north of Yorkshire now, and has established itself as such.

What it really needs now is a couple of dozen lodges being built for next season.

Some figures from another article of how bad things are for Brighton Pier Group:


The famous Brighton Pier has been put up for sale as its operator, Brighton Pier Group (BPG), struggles with falling visitor numbers and soaring costs.

The company, which also owns Lightwater Valley theme park and several mini-golf sites, said it is exploring the sale of “some or all” of its remaining assets after reporting a pre-tax loss of £7.8 million — up from £2.8 million the previous year. Revenue also dipped to £25.8 million.

BPG blamed higher wages, increased National Insurance, and cuts to business rate relief for squeezing profits. Visitor numbers have dropped, prompting the company to double the pier’s entry fee from £1 to £2 in March.

The group has already sold several bars and says the timeline for selling the pier is uncertain. No sale price has been disclosed.

The move follows a tough period for Brighton’s tourism industry, with attractions like the i360 also facing financial struggles.

Sussex News

Apologies for the double post, I've just read through the financials posted on companies house. Some notes are that the sale of Lightwater Valley was agreed by directors in April 2025.

Footfall was up by 8% at LWV with a turnover of 4.9M. From that profits were 0.7M and there was 0.2M of investment in the form of WI-FI and an indoor soft play area.

Stronger performance was accounted for by successful dynamic ticket pricing campaigns, strong advertising campaigns, concessions to food offerings (who would have thought reduced food pricing would lead to more food profits…) and more streamlined staff rotas.

Asides from LWV the rest of their accounts are less impressive.