I'm advocating an increase in guest experience and an end to discounting rather than just jacking up prices. I've already said that I think variable pricing is a good idea. But surely the recent passholder ticket scandal has shown that the park relies more heavily on non passholder attendance than we previously might have thought for a decent income?
It's undeniable, as Merlin were a PLC, that they discounted and cut themselves into a corner. It's my personal opinion that they need to strike a value balance. Commercial decisions around pricing and operational expenditure are based on projections in which consumer opinion is also taken into account. If you ask someone, as so many Merlin feedback surveys do, if they think they've paid a fair price, of course they're going to say no and would probably say so until the park is free entry. It's a bit like asking most people if they think they get paid enough by their employers, hardly anyone says yes.
With places like Oakwood charging £35 to get in, I bet you most people think a trip to Towers is more expensive than it actually is. If they can't fill the park up without selling £55 season passes then their park clearly has problems that are nothing to do with pricing.
They've ripped people off in other ways. As gate prices have remained broadly flat, BOGOFs are found everywhere and season passes have been offered for £55, they've closed attractions, closed food options, decimated entertainment, slashed opening hours and operating days and opened an up charge attraction.
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk