AT86
TS Member
they'd have to give plenty of notice.
Why?
they'd have to give plenty of notice.
I wonder if @Skyscraper is talking about Merlin giving B&M notice or about the park giving notice to guests?Why?
I meant Towers giving notice to guests and enthusiasts. Otherwise people would be disappointed if they weren't aware that it was closing for an entire season. They'll all want those last rides on the original Nemmy.I wonder if @Skyscraper is talking about Merlin giving B&M notice or about the park giving notice to guests?
I suppose this is a good point but it doesn't make me wonder how similar it will be. I'd want it to be as close to the original as possible but surely it just won't be the same. Also I hate to ask but is there any chance he was saying goodbye because they were going to remove it outright.I think it’s a case of when, not if at this stage to be honest. Personally I do think that the park would give some notice given the status of the ride and they could market it as a sort of event. But given the rumours of JW riding earlier on this season and the fact that he didn’t even do that at the last anniversary, it’s possible that he has already had his last ride and he’s said his goodbyes to the original Nemesis. It’ll be interesting to watch what happens, that’s for sure.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think people read far too much into things sometimes. John Wardley reportedly not riding Nemesis whilst visiting the park for other reasons suddenly meaning they are going to close the ride is a bit of a stretch.
I think the refurb is very likely at some point. But most likely it will be a like for like retrack so I don’t think they need to make a big deal about it or give any ‘notice’ to guests.
Hadn't thought of that. The press would have a field day!Think of it this way in the mindset of a "normal" guest:
Towers: "We're temporarily closing Nemesis for refurbishment, come ride it soon before it's gone for a season!"
Guests: "Oh great, what are you changing?"
Towers: "It'll be the same Nemesis you know and love"
Guests: "So...does that mean it's unsafe in its current form?"
Not the conversation you want to be having when it's just a temporary closure!
Personally I wouldn't change a thing apart from the station being maintained properly as its a brilliant theming structure. I would also love to see the streams red again although I know there's very little chance of that happening ever.Curious to know what aspects of the ride you would all change given the opportunity, whether it be theming or something to do with the hardware itself.
I’m not sure they’d necessarily have this issue, or at least, they wouldn’t if they clearly communicated some changes that will be more obvious at guest level. For instance, when Universal retracked Hulk in a similar vein, they had none of these issues, even though they made it clear that track would be replaced. They made some non track-related changes clear in their press releases, such as the on-board audio, the new story/queue and the new trains, and that seemed to cause no issues for them regarding the safety of the old version, even though retracking was talked about.Think of it this way in the mindset of a "normal" guest:
Towers: "We're temporarily closing Nemesis for refurbishment, come ride it soon before it's gone for a season!"
Guests: "Oh great, what are you changing?"
Towers: "It'll be the same Nemesis you know and love"
Guests: "So...does that mean it's unsafe in its current form?"
Not the conversation you want to be having when it's just a temporary closure!
The ride might be too far gone, or need too many bits replacing, to function on a bit-by-bit approach. The ride is getting old, and likely has some sections that have undergone more stress than those on most B&M coasters (while I of course haven’t done that many, sections of Nemesis are supposedly some of the most intense ride sections B&M have ever done), so when there are quite a few sections that need replacing, it makes sense to do it all in one go to remove the possibility of constantly having to do things to it at different times.Why are people assuming they'll shut it for a refurb? They'll go bit by bit when it needs doing and work over closed season. Makes zero sense to shut a functioning ride. Even if they redid the entire electrical system on it they can do it on a closed season.
I agree. I hadn't thought about them doing it that way.It's possible that it might not need an entire twelve months closure, which means it could close at the end of this season and reopen mid-July 2022, for example. Whenever it reopens, I don't think it will do so in unison with SW9. And I am very much in agreement that FV needs another signature ride if Nemesis is closed. I would like to think SW9 might show up adjacent in 2023, with Nemesis reemerging in 2024, but I think we would have seen initial plans submitted by now.
Still struggling to imagine Alton Towers without Nemesis...
I'm not exactly sure how but the red dye somehow leaked into the local (outside the park) water supply which feeds it, which obviously was an envomental hazard. The only way I see them being allowed the dye back is if the water supply was changed to a closed system (own feed pool on site, not fed by the local water supply).With red water, they can bring it back it'll just mean it wouldn't be able to be flowing over the natural rock of the pit or be near any plant life. It'd also be costly, but worth it in my opinion. I presume the water they use at the moment is untreated mains water as opposed to treated water which they also can't use if water table contamination is the issue behind it?