- News all the latest
- Theme Park explore the park
- Resort tour the resort
- Future looking forward
- History looking back
- Community and meetups
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks. - Thread starter Adthoms
- Start date
- Favourite Ride
- The Giant Squid
- Favourite Ride
- Black Hole
- Favourite Ride
- Ug Bugs
- Favourite Ride
- Ug Bugs
- Favourite Ride
- VelociCoaster (Islands of Adventure)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
[2026] Bluey Coaster in CBeebies Land
deathproof69
TS Member
Well considering how short the track itself is, can’t imagine it being any longer than that?
Bowser
TS Member
Well considering how short the track itself is, can’t imagine it being any longer than that?
Might be an omnimover.
Poisson
TS Member
It works on rides like Go Gators or Jellikns at Fantasy Island so why couldn't it work on Bluey Coaster
Go-Gators you can be allowed to ride if you fit. Some models aren't too bad space wise, some there's no chance.
That’s entirely on the BBC imo, their standards are clearly below the floor and they’re not putting the appropriate restrictions/targets in contracts which enables AT to cheap out.At this stage, in human or dog years, Bluey is wildly popular and a premium IP that the BBC intends to build a 'lifestyle brand' around.
As such, it feels a bit underwhelming that they're utilising it for this tiny coaster. Perhaps a dark ride could follow.
The perfect balance for Bluey would be an omnimover for capacity that is interactive similar to Buzz lightyear blast at DLP,
So Bluey through the attraction would replicate various stories from tasks like hunts etc with different moveable/interactive props when shot to look behind etc
It caters for the masses and is fun and interactive….
Perhaps I’m in the wrong job but to me that’s what a mass IP needs something that will be a people eater not a 3h wait for a toddler
So Bluey through the attraction would replicate various stories from tasks like hunts etc with different moveable/interactive props when shot to look behind etc
It caters for the masses and is fun and interactive….
Perhaps I’m in the wrong job but to me that’s what a mass IP needs something that will be a people eater not a 3h wait for a toddler
QTXAdsy
TS Member
It does all seem very alike to Mandril Mayhem at Chessie. An odd coaster choice with a poor throughput that was part of a deal in which Merlin needed to build it somewhere without long term thoughts. Looks like the exact same problem is happening again in which what is the company designing this new coaster and are they working a lot with Merlin at this moment in time at the other parks?
GooseOnTheLoose
TS Member
I would imagine that Merlin's contract with the BBC allows them first refusal on CBeebies licenced attractions within the UK. It might be that if Merlin do not choose to exercise that right, within a certain window, they lose the exclusivity.
Additionally, Alton Towers may be contractually obliged to only have CBeebies attractions within specified areas / zones, ruling out the option to reuse the 4D cinema, for example.
Additionally, Alton Towers may be contractually obliged to only have CBeebies attractions within specified areas / zones, ruling out the option to reuse the 4D cinema, for example.
PhalanaxOperativeA1127
TS Member
From: https://x.com/ThemeParkWW/status/1977417328259420593?t=BvM9SLeoeQDkJIiX6KPnyA&s=19
Interesting. Assuming this might be possible in a GDO area?
flyingguitar
TS Member
Is there one showing the footer or just the building, as far as the building is concerned it looks about the same as the updated plans
PhalanaxOperativeA1127
TS Member
Is there one showing the footer or just the building, as far as the building is concerned it looks about the same as the updated plans
Assuming he saw the footers from Get Set Go, but no photography allowed these days.
GooseOnTheLoose
TS Member
15 inversions and washing machine element confirmed.
Matt N
TS Member
What sort of footers would infer that? Do we think they could be very big footers or something?
I do think there being more to this than meets the eye could be a valid possibility, though. If there is, it might go some way towards explaining the rationale behind the investment, which I’m currently struggling to understand.
I do think there being more to this than meets the eye could be a valid possibility, though. If there is, it might go some way towards explaining the rationale behind the investment, which I’m currently struggling to understand.
flyingguitar
TS Member
The footers you can usually infer the manufacture (or a range) and the lay out,What sort of footers would infer that? Do we think they could be very big footers or something?
I would guess this means the layout isn't quite what it seems from the plans
flyingguitar
TS Member
Found an image of the footers, I don't see much different from the plans, it looks a bit weird however I think it is just the lateral support for a hill, as for manufacture I am not that good at identifying them, however the look similar to those used on the new legoland coaster
From: https://x.com/TowersStreet/status/1977400307433738391/photo/1
From: https://x.com/TowersStreet/status/1977400307433738391/photo/1
Jb85
TS Member
Will be hyped to do something interesting when in actuality just be a slightly weird helix.
Or a mini launch like one of the Daddy Pig coasters.
They’ve finally listened - washing machine element confirmed
PhalanaxOperativeA1127
TS Member
Could this ride have a switch track on it given some of the weird support structure positions.
I would temper all expectations, to be honest.
Chances are it's just an additional helix or something, compared to the plans.