Dave
TS Founding Member
Do u think it Octonauts didn’t need planning permission as it was replacing a coaster (Beastie) that originally was on the same plot of land.
No it didn’t need permission as it’s within the GDO.
Do u think it Octonauts didn’t need planning permission as it was replacing a coaster (Beastie) that originally was on the same plot of land.
I think the main gripe that most people have is Towers are taking out a ride that has no height restriction, so absolutely anyone can ride it, and replacing it with a coaster which will have a height restriction, so not suitable for everyone.My opinion on this is it's fine for the little ones. I don't get all the bashing that's going on. We're not the target audience for it. If it's as basic as basic can be, so be it. The little ones will like it and that's exactly who it's for. Honestly some of these comments
I'd have thought that the Postman Pat ride system could've gone between Justin's House and Andy's Dinosaur Dig as that seems to be a big empty space.Could this new coaster have no height requirement like Dino Chase at Paultons park which is why the layout looks so basic. It would certainly fill a gap as it can be a long wait for kids to hit 0.9m to ride their first coaster. It's also worth mentioning that all the info on this states the ride will be enjoyable by the whole family, so that would point to a low height requirement and maybe differentiate it from octonaughts. Maybe towers have actually considered that they are removing a ride that can be enjoyed by all so need something similar to replace it.
As for the maintenance shed, could it be that towers need to create more space with the potential loss of the Horizon area in the future ( i don't know where this currently takes place but would guess that area might be used currently )
Whilst probably never going to happen it's a shame the postman pat ride couldn't be squeezed inside the In The Night Garden ride area, there is certainly space for something in the centre island and both rides could have a retheme either sharing the theme or creating a dual sided theming so the rides are different.
I'm not sure it's that big a site, but it would be good to see something added here as well. I think what worries me is there seems to be no further expansion and only replacement rides which do nothing for an area already over capacity most days. It also feels like Cbeebies land is miles behind Thomas Land and Peppa Pig world when it comes to rides.I'd have thought that the Postman Pat ride system could've gone between Justin's House and Andy's Dinosaur Dig as that seems to be a big empty space.
Could this new coaster have no height requirement like Dino Chase at Paultons park which is why the layout looks so basic. It would certainly fill a gap as it can be a long wait for kids to hit 0.9m to ride their first coaster. It's also worth mentioning that all the info on this states the ride will be enjoyable by the whole family, so that would point to a low height requirement and maybe differentiate it from octonaughts. Maybe towers have actually considered that they are removing a ride that can be enjoyed by all so need something similar to replace it.
I'd hope Towers would replace Pat with something like for like in terms of restrictions...
I think a tracked car ride will join the long list of rides removed and not replaced.They've already set a precedent for not doing this elsewhere in the park.
I can't help but think the most sensible thing to be done in the short term would be to reinstall a rethemed version of the Postman Pat ride system in Dark Forest in some form. It's the one area where there's enough land space within the current park boundaries to effectively install a low-level track ride without replacing a current attraction.I think a tracked car ride will join the long list of rides removed and not replaced.