• ℹ️ Heads up...

    This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks.

Blackpool Pleasure Beach: 2025 Discussion

Yep next week random bits of dome will be on sale in kiss me quick for only £500 each
don't worry, I got you covered, they just need to do this:
1747955360771.png

although looking through the html and js, their website isn't all too truthful, the views are 100% fake, would 64 people really be viewing this now? but we can prove this by looking at the code:
1747955452556.png
this is the html, it probably won't make much sense, but the important things to notice are the variables (in the nasa-counting-viewing section):
data-min="10", this will be the minimum fake viewers
data-max="50", this is the maximum fake viewers of the initial random number
data-delay="15000", this is the refresh rate (every 15 seconds)
data-change="5", this is the number it can change each refresh (up to ±5 viewers)
data-id="1413031", this is the ID used for cookie storage

it is also important to notice the class is called nasa-count on the number (39)

turning to the js:
1747955671812.png
this isn't too nice to see, so stripping away most of the useless stuff we are left with this:
1747956091608.png
this essentially will generate a random number (1-5 because that count perameter) and add / subtract it from the previous valeu, if it dosn't exist then make a ransom number up. (for those who don't know math.random in js will generate a random number)

I also have seen a function called "nasa_fake_sold_promo", which never triggered when I was on the website and I didn't get too far into determening what it was as I only had part of the code, however it involves scrolling text I would guess (from the name) it would be like "___ has brought 100 of them" but it may also be old code as I couldn't find some of the elements it calls on

TLDR: the viewer count is fake, whilst I understand it is probably more common it IMO is quite a scummy thing to do, they could probably get similar sales with
 
Last edited:
I think the ASA will be interested in that - false advertising! Perhaps we should all buy a piece and put it on Mandy's lawn. 64 people will be viewing that Youtube video right now! 😁 Of course the most worrying thing is that it's not inconceivable that 64 people could be viewing a piece of concrete - put a cat on it and you're into millions!
 
What I don’t understand is, if you’re going to do something dodgy like that, why you’d do it in client side JS and not on the server where people can’t just go and look at the code.

Brain trust at Mandy’s is astonishing
 
Well I saw on the British Airways website that they have removed "I am not a robot" click-box and replaced it with "I am a human" click-box. Either some Roomba had an identity crisis or some cats have figured out how to book flights!

What happened to the re-tracked bits of PMBO - did they get cut up and sold??
 
What happened to the re-tracked bits of PMBO - did they get cut up and sold??
They did, as I have a tube of old Big One track in my bedroom!

I have one of the smaller ones rather than one of the 195cm ones that I remember seeing on the website, though.
 
What I don’t understand is, if you’re going to do something dodgy like that, why you’d do it in client side JS and not on the server where people can’t just go and look at the code.

Brain trust at Mandy’s is astonishing
from my look into the front side, I don't think they manage much of their back end, it looks like they are using a service (such as shopify) to host their listings, they will have a provider who will host the website, I would assume they don't want to deal with the extra cost of having to manage a service for generating random numbers for views (also having to deal with the security of that server, programming, etc
 
from my look into the front side, I don't think they manage much of their back end, it looks like they are using a service (such as shopify) to host their listings, they will have a provider who will host the website, I would assume they don't want to deal with the extra cost of having to manage a service for generating random numbers for views (also having to deal with the security of that server, programming, etc
Yeah I get that (I work in dev myself), but you can’t deny it’s really not a good look for them. No matter who the provider is, it’s still their site and it’s still their image that’s tarnished when things go wrong.
 
Yeah I get that (I work in dev myself), but you can’t deny it’s really not a good look for them. No matter who the provider is, it’s still their site and it’s still their image that’s tarnished when things go wrong.

I am not defending the practice here, but it is a tactic used quite alot by many companies.

While not a great look, it is not overly terrible compared to some tactics used.
 
I am not defending the practice here, but it is a tactic used quite alot by many companies.

While not a great look, it is not overly terrible compared to some tactics used.
Which I also get. But, again, I’d expect most of them to be at least a little more tactful than some non-obfuscated client side JS.
 
Pleasure Beach have just sent an email to newsletter subscribers;

Screenshot_20250523-175246.png

They'll be announcing a new Walk The experience on Monday.
 
Top