Dave
TS Founding Member
Probably in case of evacuations.
In which case it would make more sense to say anyone below the age of 14 must be accompanied by someone over the age of 18.
Probably in case of evacuations.
By the way, the Theme Park Guide live blog has said that there is no separate queue for the backwards row- you just need to be allocated row 7.
Yeah I'm surprised they didn't do that. As you say, just one row the opposite way doesn't really make sense!Another issue with this ride, why didn’t it have 8 rows with 4 facing one way and 4 facing another way?
Either way you get a backwards ride!
If you have a distraught, or otherwise a little disorganised, 6 or 7 year old when the ride is finished, then someone older (easiest to mandate via a height restriction) to guide them off the ride/station quickly makes sense from an operational risk assessment perspective.
Agreed. And with the evacuating point made earlier. My daughter was 1.2 metres at 5 years old. No way would she have been able to evacuate a ride at that age without someone she knew to hold her hand. And she was surprised by 13 to the point I had to lead her off while her mind fizzed. It’s not fair on the ride ops to expect them to deal with panicking/shocked children. They’ve got enough to deal with.If you have a distraught, or otherwise a little disorganised, 6 or 7 year old when the ride is finished, then someone older (easiest to mandate via a height restriction) to guide them off the ride/station quickly makes sense from an operational risk assessment perspective.
I don't think we should be surprised.
By the way, the Theme Park Guide live blog has said that there is no separate queue for the backwards row- you just need to be allocated row 7.
So what happens then if get someone allocated that row that really doesn’t want to ride backwards?
Then they probably shouldn’t be in the queue for a shuttle coaster…
Just shown this to my other half, she works at IKEA. They sell these for 75p...