Stumbled across this video from a former Chessington employee which provides a bit of an insight into the working culture within the park..
In terms of the video all the claims have a ring of truth, but as others have said, the titles of other videos on the channel, and the lack of context in the video, does make it all sound very questionable.
In any workplace where you’re dealing with the public it’s possible that you’ll encounter an aggressive customer. We know that Chessington gets some of the worst Trip Advisor scores of any major theme park in the world, with most of the one and star reviews being clustered on peaks days. In a workplace where you’re dealing with lots of angry customers, the risk of aggression almost certainly will be a lot higher. Even if something isn’t a specific employee’s fault, it doesn’t mean an angry customer won’t take their frustrations out on an employee.
There does also appear to be a rise in the number of assaults on people working in customer service roles in the UK, perhaps linked to backlogs in the courts and the short staffing in the police, meaning people are very unlikely to be prosecuted for assaulting staff.
Many workplaces would rather subject frontline to staff to risk the negative publicity from cases getting dragged through the courts. We know Merlin were criticised by The Smiler accident because it took 10 minutes to call the emergency services, because it had to be authorised by the duty manager. If you were generous you’d say Merlin didn’t want to waste the emergency service’s time with unnecessary calls. If you were cynical, you’d say that the company was putting their brand above people. Un-unionised workplaces like a theme park are particularly likely to prioritise the company’s reputation over protecting their staff. I’m sure Merlin’s procedures have changed since The Smiler accident. However, if a guest has assaulted an employee, would a business that historically only allowed the police to be called when it was authorised by the duty manager really have the employee’s interests at heart? And if one duty manager was calling 999 more than the others, what would that mean for their career?
It sounds like this person worked in entertainments, but Chessington have cut down on the number of staff a lot over the years, meaning there is a growing number of staff working on their own, which would considerably increase the risk to the staff.
We know that security are only paid marginally more than the minimum wage, so it is plausible that they’re not tripping over each other to get to the next aggressive guest. It’s also possible that a business looking to cut down on costs wouldn’t have enough security to staff.
It’s hard to place too much store on one person’s experiences, but to turn it around, what are Chessington doing to protect their staff from assaults? And how many staff are getting assaulted in a typical year?