On a scale of @Sazzle to @Poisson / @MattyH obviously.
I’m teary eyed at having been recognised for such a key defining point in an enthusiast debate. Having just returned today from a European trip, taking in multiple parks where I can confidently state no butterfly coasters or wacky worms were sought out, I am true to my morals and invite wider community members to join me.
Loves theme parks, will even travel to other countries to visit them. But doesn’t watch vlogs, doesn’t count creds, throws sharp objects at anyone who uses the term “thoosie”, wears Merch sparingly if at all, can watch Wardley or Roland walk by without having kittens and is happy to have a couple of goes on coasters and then chill with a beverage of choice.
Too specific dear. I fulfil most but not all and therefore am definitely somewhere around here, despite having a spreadsheet for my creds and doing a little squeak when I see the aforementioned figures.
I suggest we start drawing up a points based classification tool and make this official.
Maybe there’s a corresponding reward depending on your
diagnosis achievement affliction passion level? I’ll leave that out there for consideration.
…and on topic…
As with any self-identified group or community, it’s easy to create an “us & them” view and this is somewhat based on a perceived power share around “I / we know more than you do”. So therefore anyone else is given a “general” sweeping category rather than a specialist label.
I don’t think I’ve ever used general public as a derogatory term, rather as a way to refer to guests who are not otherwise known as enthusiasts. Not a bad shout to consider casual guest as an alternative.
Interestingly I was having this debate recently around how being passionate around themeparks and coasters has become more accepted and accessible than it ever has been. It used to be a niche, and sometimes stigmatised, passion.
“Back in my day” etc…