With the HH being a 90s ride, it’s hard to tell how it would be received today if it were still around in its original form. It might still be well received (I obviously don’t know), but with regard to your comment about the lack of 4K video making it look worse, I almost wonder the opposite. Could that have benefitted people’s memories of HH, as a lower quality video camera is less likely to pick up on the smaller holes in an experience like the ones many see in Duel today, such as extractor fans and lighting in places where it shouldn’t be? In those old HH POVs, the cameras wouldn’t have been as good at picking up the surrounding details, and would have been hyper-focused on the main theming piece, whereas the modern day cameras filming Duel in its present state are much better at picking up that sort of thing in the background.
For what it’s worth; when reading back through this thread, a few people who were around back when the HH closed said that it already felt outdated by 2002, and there was “no great outpouring of loss” for it when it was announced as closing. Admittedly, maintenance could have played a role in that, but the 2002 video you showed the other day still looked pretty similar to all the 1990s videos you hail as the ride’s prime. With 20 years having passed since the original HH’s closure; any “outdatedness” people felt an attraction had in 2002 would only be exacerbated if the attraction in question were still around today, what with 20 years of advances in technology.
I’m not trying to understate HH’s status at the time of its opening or undermine its role in Alton Towers’ history by any stretch; I know that it was hugely well received upon opening, and was hugely influential in boosting Alton Towers’ fortunes.
However, while I’ve said this before, I’ll say it again; with 20 years having passed since HH’s closure, people’s memories of the original HH getting ever hazier, and the number of people who never experienced HH ever increasing, I do wonder about how much of the ride’s current status is based on nostalgia, whether that be people’s own nostalgia of the time or borrowed nostalgia. This might sound stupid, but nostalgia can be a very powerful thing; for instance, I have brilliant memories of riding CATCF from when I was a child, but I was only 11 when I last rode it, and based on its general reception on here being starkly negative, I’m not going to deny that nostalgia from my own childhood is probably making me remember that ride as being stronger than it actually was. For all intents and purposes, the HH is still with us; as much as people like to paint Duel and HH as being totally different attractions, with the latter usually being hailed as far superior, I think that you’d be surprised at how similar the ride would actually be if you reverted it back to its original specification. Based on the videos I’ve seen of HH in its original form, there wouldn’t be an awful lot of difference at all.
I think your example of Haunted Mansion is an interesting one. Having ridden it, I absolutely wouldn’t call it outdated; I really liked the attraction! However, I’d be very, very surprised if that ride still operates to its exact original specification; I’d wager that Disney has probably made at very least minor technical updates to it over the years to keep it relevant. From memory, there are certain bits of technology in HM that I’d be surprised if they were around when the ride opened in the 70s. If HM had been kept to its exact original specification, I think the crowd calling it outdated would be far larger.
Sorry if that whole post sounds massively confrontational or disregarding of your opinion; that wasn’t my intent. I guess you probably know far more about HH than me, anyway, as you seem very passionate about it. I know a lot of my argument is probably at least partially based on conjecture, which undermines it a bit compared to yours.