Yes, I keep telling @Matt N "you've got to stop being so cynical mate" but he never listens.I understand all of this from a business perspective, and have the same gut feeling as you. Just chipping in as a perhaps representative casual visitor in that cost of living crisis myself.
The guest feedback for Alton Towers is visibly dire, and the word-of-mouth is unlikely to be much better. You don't need to be a nerd procrastinating on a forum to be aware of this, although in the age of theme park 'lifestyle', there are more guests lurking in places like this than ever, even if the hardcore don't particularly seem to be keen to vote with their feet. In terms of the future, I'd tend to side with the more cynical of the two Matts on this thread; For all the obvious enthusiasm and stellar PR that someone like Bianca brings to the business, I think there might be too much rot to stop without huge vision and financial resources. The profile and size of the park has not been reflected in how it is operated for nearly two decades now. As occasions like the launch of Nemesis Reborn prove, the passion is there to pull it out of the bag when needs be, but the whole place is just far too temperamental of an experience.
New investors in any business have the potential to change everything, for better or worse. Business strategies aren't rigid. It won't change the facts of where the parks are now, but different ownership could bring new investment with it. It could also do the opposite.New investors won’t change anything, the facts are still the same.
I’m not as gloomy about the future though, I have said pretty consistently that we won’t know what’s happening regarding the future of the park until at least 2025 as there was so much money needed spending just to stand still. This on top of one of the worst summers as far as weather is concerned and it’s hardly a shock.
Uptime on rides is a problem, but again you have so much neglect to fix.
Not saying it’s certain things will get better just that we can’t know yet.
Yes, I keep telling @Matt N "you've got to stop being so cynical mate" but he never listens.
New investors in any business have the potential to change everything, for better or worse. Business strategies aren't rigid. It won't change the facts of where the parks are now, but different ownership could bring new investment with it. It could also do the opposite.
There's no way of knowing for sure, but looking at the Merlin portfolio, I still don't think being tied to this group is good for the RTP's. They're high risk and high investment entities, vastly different from eachother and anything but cookie cutter formats like Legolands, Dungeons, aquariums and waxworks. The UK parks seem like these annoying money drains that are useful anchors in which to sell annual passes.
I understand that planning and large investments take time, but after 5 years I think we'd know by now if mountains of cash were coming. They must have spent a fortune already just to stand still, with some of the rot like the knackered Spa and upcoming monorail removal being fires that couldn't be put out. As impressive and passionate as Bianca is, and as much cash that's been injected into Towers as it has, it's not enough to sort the parks long term issues. Meanwhile, there's other group wise attractions to worry about.
The Haunted House had changes ranging from a new props to whole revamped scenes almost every other year until it closed, so this doesn't really hold true. However this just made it more incoherent really and it certainly had declined a lot by the end.While Pearson Tussauds did invest an awful lot into new rides and other CAPEX, I gather that they still had a certain unwillingness to invest in improvements and proper long-term preventative maintenance that didn’t have a direct return on investment.
For example, John Wardley came on here and revealed that he and Keith Sparks had multiple new scares planned for the Haunted House, to be added year on year to keep it fresh… but Pearson Tussauds refused to grant the money for these, because the ride had already been built and been a success and further improvements wouldn’t provide an adequate return on investment.
On the topic of the Haunted House, Merlin were often lambasted for letting Duel get into a state… but I’ve had people tell me before that the Haunted House was poorly maintained and in a state since as early as 1998.
One interesting sign I would potentially point to with regard to the investment mentality of "new Merlin" is that both Nemesis Reborn and Hyperia supposedly had money granted to them for extra theming by Scott O'Neil.Considering that in 2024, the 'new' attractions we've seen across Merlin have, in fact, been projects commissioned by the 'old Merlin', I feel it's still hard to judge where the 'new Merlin' stands in terms of investments.
Alton Towers is a mess, and it would probably take ten years to get the park back to an acceptable standard with steady investment in new and existing attractions and infrastructure. Unfortunately, there is not an unlimited pot of money to delve into, and it's still a business. I wouldn't expect miracles, and I feel we will see more of the same for a long while, with perhaps the odd improvement here and there.
are currently presiding over operating hours cuts,
Do we know this as a fact?indefinitely halting Project Horizon.
A few things you could probably add to that:Taking the point that a lot of the now praised recent additions were commissioned under the old regime, it’s interesting to isolate the decisions which we can attribute to the current regime. In my view, it’s not a pretty picture: -
- indefinitely halting Project Horizon.
- cuts to opening hours of the theme park.
- cuts to opening hours of the water park.
- cuts to the event lineup.
- closure of the Retrosquad with no immediate replacements.
- introduction of RAP booking procedure.
- resurfaacing a car park.
- continued poor ride availability.
- perpetual F&B price increases, with some isolated improvements in offering.
- construction of a new flat ride on the Ripsaw site.
- extended closure of Hex for maintenance.
- extended closure of Skyride for maintenance.
- staggered openings introduced across the park.
- introduction of a charge for tours of the Towers, but seemingly no intention to reopen to the public generally.
- More communication aimed at fans.
I’m sure I’ve forgotten some bits, but I don’t think by those metrics show there is any material improvement. Arguably, we’ve gone backwards.
Just to set expectations, they are hoping that Hex will be opening in Autumn and that the Skyride will be operational in due course.Also Hex will be opening this Autumn after many months of refurbishments and Skyride will plausibly be operational in the next 12 to 18 months,
I'm more sure about about Hex (though nothing's is set in stone) but much more pessimistic about the Skyride being functional in the next 6 to 8 months (it's far larger infrastructure across uneven forested grounds and well over a decade older than the Hex attraction) and that darn entrance monorail looked naff by the time of the Bush Jr. Administration (and been on life-support since Obama's), but if Drayton Manor can keep their very similar the Haunting flat/dark ride on the road after 20+ years, so should better funded Merlin with Hex (but it sounds like Alton suffered badly from "getting robbed to pay Paul" after dropping the ball with the Smiler incident, if its parent company is tending to 139 other operations worldwide0.There are actually no guarantees here, given that neither of them were planned closures, and both have already had overoptimistic opening schedules. In the case of Hex, it has now had two (and more realistically three) expected periods when they thought it would be reopening and it has failed to do so.