Tell that to a family who had a Family Annual Pass and their kids had been looking forward to the night for the last month and got refused entry. Then a couple of 20 somethings turn up as part of a boozy afternoon/evening and just rock on in because they bought their reduced price entry tickets on-line a few days ago. If you're OK with that then I would question your thought process. If not, surely the best thing would have been to allow anyone in until capacity was reached, then turn away EVERYONE. Only people I can think of who should be excluded from that would be people who were already staying in the hotels. I wonder what the Daily Mail will have to say about all this ay?
I didn't say I was or wasn't ok with anything, I just said I understood where they were coming from. *IF* it had to be a choice between the two, I can see why they chose to favour pre-paid guests over MAPs, that's all. And my thought process is just fine, thank you .
But what I will say, however, is that anyone serious about wanting a trip to Towers on what has historically always been the busiest night of the year, I would expect them not to be so naive as to turn up in the late afternoon, which is when Towers started refusing guests entry. When any type of first come/first served system is in place, turning up later in the day is ridiculously reckless in my opinion, and you only have yourself to blame if you are turned away. When I take my two kids to Towers (which, I hasten to add, is a very long journey for me), I would make sure I am there as early as possible so as to avoid upset - and I am an annual pass holder.
So if we take you hypothetical suggestion of an Annual Pass family being refused entry, I'd question why, if their kids were looking forward to it so much, their parents hadn't tried to arrive as early as possible? And if they had known in advance that they wouldn't be able to get there before late afternoon, perhaps it'd have been better not to have committed to going in the first place.
Last edited: