I think that's too simplistic an approach. It could be human error but it could human error because a system allowed a human to make the error. Human did X because technology allowed them to.If its human error, it has nothing to do with gerst. They would have no problem using them again.
That links in to my response above. Different parks and chains will take their own view, whatever the outcome. Intamin have been at fault for quite a few incidents over the years and they still sell a lot of hardware.To be honest, if this does turn out to be human error, Gerst are the real losers here. They're just starting to make a name for themselves, yet their reputation would be tarnished by an event totally outside of their control.
Even if it does turn out to be "human error", the system should never have allowed the human to make that error in the first place.
yes, think your right (obviously won't know until the hse report comes out) but i think that if you were the engineer on the smiler, and all day, every day, you just had to restart the ride again and again and again, you'd eventually get to the point where you didn't check why, you'd just assume its the same problem again, especially in a scenario where it had just broke down about 5 minutes earlier. This could be an issue with human error, and if it is, there is little geurst, merlin or anyone else can do to prevent itI agree, but if you could never reset a coaster, what would they ever have done when The Smiler previously stalled? The system has to allow an overide of sorts, and you'd hope it would never actually be used with guests on board! Speculation still of course, but I do think something like this played a big part.
I still don't understand how the stall was not spotted and the ride evaced immediately. For me, whatever went wrong after that, it is the biggest failing by far.
What sort of mad situation would make the above ideal?Yes, I'm not denying that the system SHOULD have stoped it, but what you might be overlooking is the fact that the engineers have the ability to MANUALLY override the safety systems. This caused the Alton mouse to crash. A ride op restarted the ride manually after it had e-stopped, even though it had stopped because a car had stalled. Luckily this time, no one was on said cars
This could be an issue with human error, and if it is, there is little geurst, merlin or anyone else can do to prevent it
Could they not put the reset button at the bottom of lift 2 so you could see the whole track there and on the way there so would be very hard not to see.
But 2 already did make it back. And as I understand it if it was running 5 trains it cant get them all In the station and final break run.Or even simpler, after any reset send one more test car round and Wait for it to come back before sending a loaded train!
Isn't this common sense?!
yes, think your right (obviously won't know until the hse report comes out) but i think that if you were the engineer on the smiler, and all day, every day, you just had to restart the ride again and again and again, you'd eventually get to the point where you didn't check why, you'd just assume its the same problem again, especially in a scenario where it had just broke down about 5 minutes earlier. This could be an issue with human error, and if it is, there is little geurst, merlin or anyone else can do to prevent it
Only tech services have the manual ride keySo on this basis the ride wouldn't have alerted the ride op to the fact a train hadn't reached a specific block section and would have just thrown a generic error? Surely this isn't right.
Can anyone put a ride into manual mode? Is there a key or a password that only more qualified members of staff have access too?
This would be a good idea, they should force the engineer to physically go out of the control room to clear the ride from an outdoor control panel before it can be fully reset.Could they not put the reset button at the bottom of lift 2 so you could see the whole track there and on the way there so would be very hard not to see.