Almost certainly.Wonder if this will have an influence on the choice of future ride manufacturers?
Surely, if the ride system did everything it could have done and was not the cause of the incident, then why not use Gerst again? There's no evidence so far that the system/hardware didn't do it's job!Almost certainly.
That's what I was thinking. They've had lots of problems with the smiler before which certainly weren't human error!If its human error, it has nothing to do with gerst. They would have no problem using them again.
That said, bolts falling out the track and wheels falling off isn a good record.
To be honest, if this does turn out to be human error, Gerst are the real losers here. They're just starting to make a name for themselves, yet their reputation would be tarnished by an event totally outside of their control.
I get your point, but I still disagree. Of course they are established enough to stick around and their pricing provides them with a firm place on the market - there is no doubt that Gerst coasters will continue cropping up all over Europe. But I do feel that regardless of which error(s) caused the crash - be it human error, operational error, manufacturing or systematic error - Gerst are going to be associated with the accident. Even if the final HSE report is published (which it probably won't be) and totally acquits Gerst, the manufacturer is always going to carry some of the baggage simply due to a lack of enlightenment. I just think it has damaged Gerst's reputation significantly even when it possibly is totally outside of their control, which is a huge shame.
I wouldn't bet on itAt least itv have some limits. *looks at sky news*