bluesonichd
TS Member
Science? Probability and math... Its too late on a friday nite, my brain hurts
Although I was flippant with my lottery comment earlier, it is actually pretty easy to work out fatal accident rates. There is a HSE publication called Reducing Risks Protecting People - otherwise known in the safety industry as R2P2 - which has lots of good stuff about tolerable risk criteria. It also includes examples of injury and fatal accident rates in different industries and activities. For fairground rides, the probability of an injury is 1 in 2,326,000 rides, and for a death it is 1 in 834,000,000 rides. So the 16 people hurt in 4 million rides statistic isn't far off the industry average.The only way to work it out is by using many many years worth of statistics, simple as. You can't try to fudge numbers using estimates for how an event could happen as you will miss many different probabilities.
Edit: Is it really Friday?! After finishing exams I've lost all sense of time, only when the sun is out or not!
May have a gander, but diving is that bad?! it is mad though that you're 20 times more likely to die on a train yet no-one seems to have a problem with that. Oh perception is a beautiful thing.Although I was flippant with my lottery comment earlier, it is actually pretty easy to work out fatal accident rates. There is a HSE publication called Reducing Risks Protecting People - otherwise known in the safety industry as R2P2 - which has lots of good stuff about tolerable risk criteria. It also includes examples of injury and fatal accident rates in different industries and activities. For fairground rides, the probability of an injury is 1 in 2,326,000 rides, and for a death it is 1 in 834,000,000 rides. So the 16 people hurt in 4 million rides statistic isn't far off the industry average.
By contrast, the rail travel fatal accident rate is 1 in 43,000,000 journeys, and for diving, 1 in 200,000 dives - but nobody is clamouring for train journeys or diving to be banned. I think this just goes to show that fairground rides are actually very safe, and people shouldn't be put off going on them. If you are really interested in such things, R2P2 is worth a read - but it is a bit dry!
Yes, that is why diving is excluded from most travel insurance policies.May have a gander, but diving is that bad?! it is mad though that you're 20 times more likely to die on a train yet no-one seems to have a problem with that. Oh perception is a beautiful thing.
I must use this saying more often. Although they say sex sells, so that's probably exactly what all of the media are currently doing! Shame though, you don't really hear about how well managed this whole situation is(and more importantly gets funding for the researcher who has sexed up his findings!).
She thrives on controversy, and always has - it guarantees her viewers, as people tune in thinking 'what will she say next?'.
Although with lots of people on here complaining to her via Ofcom, I'd find it funny that out of everything she's ever done, it's criticising Nick Varney of all people that lands her in hot water!
Seeing Nick now for a few times I have to say this man is such a pleasant and kind person. It`s just great to see that he made it to the top of such a big company
I just wonder how this will affect park attendances in the short term? From a purely selfish point of view I hope less people will be at the park when I am there in a few weeks! But I just wonder how school parties might be affected? I will be there midweek just before the schools in England break up (schools in Scotland break up earlier) and last time my family did this a large number of people in the park were school groups on end of year outings. I wonder how many parents will stop their kids going now because of the adverse reaction?
However I'm sure that's just because we are biased to support Varney.