Bowser
TS Member
It’s not harsh, really.
Of course the “target” aren’t thinking about landscaping but the entire point of theme parks is that they’re immersive and give visitors a warm, fuzzy feeling subconsciously because for the time they’re inside they feel totally surrounded by that theme and “in” that world. This is harder to achieve with piles of mud, big warehouses and a derelict rapids channel and - in my view - hard to justify when parents of the target are paying a pretty penny to give their kids the most memorable day out possible.
If we’re going to go down the “let’s cut them some slack for an obviously unfinished product” route then Merlin might as well not theme anything anymore and plonk rides down on concrete slabs à la Adventure Island.
I agree with this. Even restricting comparisons to UK standards, there's a reason the work of John Wardley is so beloved to this day and its beyond innovative ride systems.
Children cherish those memories of entering Transylvania and the organ player, blood red waterfalls as a monster flies round you, queuing through a graveyard and so on. Traipsing round a building site spoils the immersion.
It's a shame nobody seemed to continue the mantle on that front. I struggle to think of a single ride in the UK he wasn't involved with that made that level of effort. I suppose The Dragon at Legoland might be the closest.