London Entertainment Resort: All Discussion

Discussion in 'European Parks and Attractions' started by Spark, 8th Oct 2012.

  1. Matt N

    Matt N TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    8,408
    Likes Received:
    7,060
    Location:
    Forest of Dean
    Favourite Ride:
    Mako (SeaWorld Orlando)
    In fairness, it’s a genuine concern that Merlin is airing with the project; I think numerous other bodies, including BALPPA, have aired a similar concern. I don’t think Merlin is just defying their competition for the sake of it.
     
  2. Craig

    Craig TS Administrator Team Member

    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    5,454
    I've seen a lot of in people go in on Merlin over this letter, but as much as I slate them over a myriad of other things I don't believe it to be anti competition.

    The concerns basically boil down to a worry that London Resort are potentially evading proper scrutiny by submitting some documents after the period for representations has ended. As mentioned, the main document they are concerned about is one was assessing the current leisure market in the UK. As an existing operator, that's bound to make reference to Merlin's own operations in the UK. I don't think it's anti competition for Merlin (and remember BALPPA who represent the industry in the UK as a whole) to want themselves and others to have proper time to review and make representations based on the information put forward.

    The term "anti competition" is to unlawfully suppress competition. That's a bold claim to make at the moment, as they are merely questioning that the correct processes and procedure are used. You could argue the reverse be true in that London Resort are being anti competitive by submitting such a document later to prevent valid concerns being raised.

    Let's say I owned a takeaway and one of the same type was setting up next door. The planning documents were put through, and as annoyed as I am about it there's nothing in those documents that give me any cause for concern. The planning drags on as the building is listed, but the council allow for some time to allow for some further drawings to be submitted. Six months down the line they submit that info along with another document that has nothing to do with the listed building, but about the current takeaway market in the area. It's incorrectly saying I make a six figure sum of profit every year and there's a swell of surplus demand from customers in the area. The information is wrong, but I have no ability to argue against those claims as the period to do so has finished. That's a simplification, but that's what Merlin and BALPPA are getting at here.

    Anti competition is not the same as a business wanting to protect their interests by ensuring everyone goes through the same planning process and procedure as they themselves would be subjected to. If something like London Resort got off the ground, it's right that all parties, be that Merlin, BALPPA members or the general public at large have all the information needed to assess the application at the correct time and have the necessary period to review and comment on it.
     
    Rosie, altongeek, jon81uk and 5 others like this.
  3. Stuntman707

    Stuntman707 TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    607
    Favourite Ride:
    Nemesis
    I understand your point, but surely it is the planning inspectorates job to ensure the application process is done properly and fairly. Not the interested parties having to moan to the inspectorate that they’re not doing it properly.
     
    SuperMuscleMan likes this.
  4. Craig

    Craig TS Administrator Team Member

    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    5,454
    It is their job, but planning is a complex process, and both individuals and businesses have a right to raise their concerns if they believe the process isn't being followed correctly. As it stands, Merlin and BALPPA are not "moaning" but have simply raised what they believe are valid concerns, in the same way that others have as this application has progressed. It's now down to the Planning Inspectorate to review it and decide accordingly - it's not simply that Merlin can say "no" and the whole thing not go ahead. From a personal point of view, I do think what they have raised is very valid. As we're all very aware, theme parks in the UK have so many hoops to jump through for planning applications. It already must be pretty galling to have London Resort flagged as a Nationally Significant "Infrastructure" Project, which as I've mentioned in this topic in the past is a bit of a push for a project of this type. I don't blame any of them for wanting to have a level playing field and ensure everyone goes through the same level of scrutiny.

    Ultimately, this is the planning system working - it's slow and cumbersome at times, but for a project of this size it's vital that the process is correctly followed, and any concerns no matter how "petty" some may think they may be are evaluated and responded to.
     
    jon81uk and Skyscraper like this.
  5. OilyWater

    OilyWater TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    3,581
    Location:
    Crawley
    This is just totally normal process for a major development like this which theme park fans on Twitter seem to not realise cos 'Merlin bad'

    To be honest I dont know why it was even reported by theme park fansites, it's very boring and procedural. It means nothing to fans anyway, it doesnt really indicate one thing or another about the park
     
  6. Stuntman707

    Stuntman707 TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    607
    Favourite Ride:
    Nemesis
    The main thing it shows to me is that the London Resort is at least something that has the attention of Merlin if nothing else.
     
    SuperMuscleMan likes this.
  7. Rick

    Rick TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    5,390
    Likes Received:
    10,496
    Location:
    Argleton
    Favourite Ride:
    Crux
    Never underestimate this community's ability to talk about nothing.

    It does indicate one very obvious thing, chiefly that there is still resource being put into this project, whether that be time, money or both.

    We can debate as to whether it will happen or not (see previous 82 pages), but it's worth remembering any multi-billion pound project takes time, often lots of it.
     
    MaxPower, Jb85, OilyWater and 3 others like this.
  8. Funcone

    Funcone TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    807
    Likes Received:
    1,733
    To be fair, there isn't a lot happening in the UK theme park scene at the moment. It's like we're trapped in the world's longest closed season. And anything that doesn't involve Brexit or Coronavirus makes a change of conversation. And let's be honest, when people choose to read the London Resort thread, what are they expecting? It's not like people are clicking on this thread expecting to see photos of the Vekoma flying coaster being built, and then getting disappointed by a discussion into planning procedures.
     
    MaxPower and Skyscraper like this.
  9. Tim

    Tim TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    2,381
    Likes Received:
    2,146
    Location:
    Cambridge
    Favourite Ride:
    Air / Blue Fire
    Actually I'd say there's a lot of really interesting things happening in the UK Theme Park scene that could be generating a lot of discussion:

    - We appear to be reaching the end of a global pandemic that could have forever changed the way parks operate. "What if 2020 happens again" could be a real planning concern with new developments in the future.

    - Paultons have opened a very well themed land that's refreshingly different to what other UK parks are doing.

    - Drayton Manor seem to be making a miraculous revival. Also does the reopening of their rapids signify that the Merlin water rides will finally be able to turn the water effects back on again?

    - In more negative news LWV and Flamingo Land both seem to have been hit bad, but the reasons for it are worth discussing.

    - Most importantly (because I feel like this has gone under the radar) Legoland appear to have had some serious investment this year. Not only have they added a major new ride and land (with some really impressive new lego models) but they're replaced old models all over the park and had some major infrastructure work. This is a really positive sign that Merlins new investors are prepared to put in the money when it's needed.
    We can debate how much this will extend to the non-Lego branded attractions but I'm cautiously optimistic that if the changes at Legoland are received positively they'll want to see similar results at the other parks.

    So there's a lot going on at the moment that's really interesting to talk about.

    But back on topic...

    The irony is my takeaway from Merlins message is the same I've heard enthusasts make countless times. This project has been cycling through the planning process over and over again, how our they allowed to do this?
    Only difference is Merlin's found a legitimate point to hit them with.
     
    Jb85, MaxPower, jon81uk and 4 others like this.
  10. OilyWater

    OilyWater TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    1,562
    Likes Received:
    3,581
    Location:
    Crawley
    I meant more the discussion on Twitter really, lots of people complaining about Merlin and needing to have an opinion on something not worth it, based on misunderstanding what this is
     
    Skyscraper likes this.
  11. SuperMuscleMan

    SuperMuscleMan TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    354
    Location:
    Sussex
    Favourite Ride:
    Colossus
    I believe it's a good thing Merlin have got involved. It means merlins lawyers are forgetting to add more yellow health and safety signs in random places and if it gets through the next stage we could see m£rlin actually getting some big investment investment in the parks.
     
    MaxPower and Skyscraper like this.
  12. AT86

    AT86 TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    2,637
    Likes Received:
    7,232
    djtruefitt, Matt N and Skyscraper like this.
  13. RoyJess

    RoyJess TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    4,025
    Likes Received:
    7,908
    I see there is a question mark on the planned opening date. Still not happening!
     
    Poisson, MaxPower, Jonathan and 2 others like this.
  14. Benjsh

    Benjsh TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    1,849
    Likes Received:
    2,948
    Location:
    Manchester
    Favourite Ride:
    Steel Vengeance
    More chance of Matt Hancock being knighted for services to his country than this park ever being built.
     
    Last edited: 28th Jun 2021
  15. WillPS

    WillPS TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    866
    I mean it's a ridiculous timeline isn't it. Ignoring the financial improbability of the whole thing - looking at the site as it is now, 2 years is way beyond optimistic for how quickly you could get the site from what it is now to something simple like a housing estate or retail park - leave alone a bloody theme park.
     
  16. Matt N

    Matt N TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    8,408
    Likes Received:
    7,060
    Location:
    Forest of Dean
    Favourite Ride:
    Mako (SeaWorld Orlando)
    I saw “by 2026” referenced somewhere else, so they might not necessarily be sticking firmly to the 2024 timeline.
     
    Skyscraper likes this.
  17. Connor98

    Connor98 TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    359
    Likes Received:
    557
    Location:
    Leicestershire
    Favourite Ride:
    Hyperion
    This whole project is just utter pie in the sky. 2024, 2026… it’s not happening. It’ll be 2034 or 2036 when it’s dragged out another 10 years. I feel sorry for the horse, it’s been flogged to death.
     
    Poisson likes this.
  18. WillPS

    WillPS TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    596
    Likes Received:
    866
    Still pretty wild when you consider how long the much simpler development by Gullivers in Rother Valley took.
     
    Matt N and Skyscraper like this.
  19. Poisson

    Poisson TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    2,132
    Location:
    Behind You
    Favourite Ride:
    The Giant Squid
    Even reduced down to a simpler level, Wicker Man took about a year and a half and that's in a functioning theme park with all the services ready to be plumbed in, all the rest of the infrastructure there and it's just a simple woodie. Think of the army of contractors working around the clock you'd need to open a basic theme park with some hired in fair rides and a coaster in a similar time frame.
     
    Skyscraper likes this.
  20. Matt N

    Matt N TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    8,408
    Likes Received:
    7,060
    Location:
    Forest of Dean
    Favourite Ride:
    Mako (SeaWorld Orlando)
    They might be hiring similarly rapid contractors to the ones who built Zadra at Energylandia; it seemed as though one minute, that thing was a field, and the next, it was open!
     
    Skyscraper likes this.

Share This Page