- News all the latest
- Theme Park explore the park
- Resort tour the resort
- Future looking forward
- History looking back
- Community and meetups
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks. - Thread starter Rob
- Start date
- Favourite Ride
- Megafobia!
- Favourite Ride
- Megafobia!
- Favourite Ride
- Megafobia!
- Favourite Ride
- Megafobia!
- Favourite Ride
- Megafobia!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Oakwood Discussion
RLP
TS Member
Completely fair to ask — a lot of people have big ideas for Oakwood, but not many have taken real steps. This isn’t one of those vague “what ifs.” It’s a live, structured proposal — fully developed, professionally written, and already presented to the current owners (Aspro), Welsh Government, and other stakeholders.Is there any proof of financial firepower to actually do this? Sounds like a vague idea at best. I hope it works, but remain unconvinced.
We’ve done our homework. The proposal includes operational timelines, risk mitigation, site condition planning, IP transfer terms, and due diligence processes — all ready to go the moment we’re allowed. It’s designed to bring Oakwood into the modern era without losing what made it iconic in the first place.
We’re not just chasing nostalgia. We’re building something that works year-round, with accessibility, digital integration, community access, and Welsh culture at its core. The operational plan has space for STEM learning zones, family-first pricing, dog-friendly day care, neurodiverse guest spaces, EV transport, and themed storytelling that actually reflects Wales.
We’re not pretending to own the park. But the second we get the green light, everything’s ready to move — and we’ll be completely transparent with the public once it’s viable. Until then, no spin — just facts, preparation, and a clear vision.
Appreciate the doubt — it keeps things real. But behind the scenes, this isn’t a fantasy.
James Watkins
TS Member
Can I ask, how much do you expect the project to cost / do you know what needs to be spent to bring the park back to an operational standard?
RLP
TS Member
Hi Danny, drop us an Email (link on website), someone will pick it up and reply back if you are unsure.I'll bite.
What's the proof that you are the ones behind the project, other than a forum username based off a press release?
RLP
TS Member
It really depends on if we acquire the park and what exactly is left when that happens. But based on current estimates, phase one to bring it back to operational standard would be around £35 million. This covers essential refurbishments, infrastructure upgrades, accessibility improvements, and some new attractions.Can I ask, how much do you expect the project to cost / do you know what needs to be spent to bring the park back to an operational standard?
Until we know what’s included in the acquisition, it’s tough to give a precise figure beyond that.
RLP
TS Member
Totally fair — healthy scepticism is more than reasonable at this stage. We’re early, and there’s a long way to go before anything is confirmed. All we can do is keep showing our work and stay transparent as things develop.I have no questions to ask and retain a healthy scepticism at such an early stage, but wish you luck.
Appreciate the well wishes. If it does move forward, we hope to earn your confidence with actions, not just plans.
RLP
TS Member
Thanks — and agreed, Nutty Jake has serious legacy value. If we get control and the IP’s still usable, it’s definitely something we’d want to revive in some form.I wish you luck in your endeavour @RLP, my only suggestion would be to bring back some form of Nutty Jake attraction to park.
If your estimate of £35 million just to re-open the park is accurate, it's difficult to see how financially viable it will be to pull off though.
On the £35m: that figure isn’t random or bloated. It’s from a formal regeneration model based on real infrastructure, compliance, and attraction costs — aimed at turning a closed park into a modern, accessible, year-round destination. We’re not pretending to foot that alone, and we’re not pretending this is easy.
It's a heavy lift because it needs to be — half-measures won't cut it. People deserve Oakwood to shine all year!
Tom
TS Member
Are you using so-called AI to generate or supplement responses to questions?
What is the extent of the Welsh government's engagement with you?
Do your proposals rely on any funding from the Welsh or UK governments?
How is it that you are able to envisage investment in major rides at this stage?
Do you have access to the park's visitor numbers for 2024?
Do you have knowledge of the land value of the entire estate/park?
What is the extent of the Welsh government's engagement with you?
Do your proposals rely on any funding from the Welsh or UK governments?
How is it that you are able to envisage investment in major rides at this stage?
Do you have access to the park's visitor numbers for 2024?
Do you have knowledge of the land value of the entire estate/park?