Skyscraper
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but isn't that showing a queue well within the confines of the designated queue line and therefore an expected length?
Lady in pink was the end of the line apparently. You can see it going at the side of the arch.I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but isn't that showing a queue well within the confines of the designated queue line and therefore an expected length?
Unless I'm mistaken, the end of the RAP queue is the lady you can see in the distance over the shoulder of the Ride Host standing at the ride entrance. None of the people in the foreground are in a queue.
It's a relatively new thing. A decade ago it wasn't like this (as I'm sure you know). It must be a combination of more awareness of mental health issues, Merlin parks being too lenient and the British public being willing to take advantage of the lenient nature of the rules. Then you add the fact that 4-5 people can be party with the differently abled person and we end up with big RAP queues.
I don't think lot of European countries recognise cognitive disabilities as much as the UK does, so their access systems are more aimed at those who have mobility difficulties/in wheelchairs.I don’t get how it’s a massive issue in the UK but you just don’t see it abroad?
It is that parks abroad simply don’t have RAP? The British just depend that they are entitled to everything? I’ve done a variety of parks this summer and other than the odd person coming in the exit, you just don’t see it. Then you come to towers and the RAP queue is longer than the main queue at times.
Comparative to the handful of people an hour I saw working on rides at the park nearly 2 decades ago, the difference is stark. The idea there are now 50 to a hundred times more needy people is nonsensical.
I am curious as to why it only seems to cause issues in the UK Merlin parks, though. No other UK parks have issues to the same degree, Europa Park didn’t have issues to the same degree, and even the Florida parks don’t have issues to the same degree.
That rounds like a "Reasonable Adjustment " to me. I don't consider the status que to be a "Reasonable Adjustment " for anyone.I would support a hard limit for number of RAP holders allowed on park in any one day. Seems like it'd make it a fair experience
There's 2 obvious reasonable adjustments: 1 ride per ride per day and/or a limit to RAP guests. The guest limit allows RAP users to ride what they want but also acts as a deterrent to falsely claiming RAP as there's a limit per day but doesn't restrict choice.
Unfortunately that doesn't work against those abusing it, only those needing it. For those abusing they end up with effectively a one shot fastrack for every ride and then can queue up to ride again. Those actually unable to queue just get their single ride.
I do wonder if it's worth considering that perhaps there are people who previously couldn't access the parks due to their needs who are now attending because the accessibility has improved? I also understand that some people do abuse the system.
Merlin parks have higher RAP limits I believe. Somewhere like Paultons for example, has a much lower RAP capacity. It's always been my assumption that the stricter nature of assessments/less needs recognised in other countries, reduces the amount of people who could access the service or even the park. In some of the groups I'm part of, parents who would be able to do multiple rides in the UK with their children, have had reduced experiences overseas - sometimes only being able to go on one ride because their child cannot cope without RAP & they do not qualify abroad.
There is also the fact that Merlin park ops (UK) are not always the best...
Just my take on it! It's definitely multi-faceted.
That'd be up to the park to time people out properly