Robert.W
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
A whole two hours!? Perhaps “Not Enough Room on the Broom” would be a more fitting nameI wasn't prepared to wait 2 hours
A whole two hours!? Perhaps “Not Enough Room on the Broom” would be a more fitting nameI wasn't prepared to wait 2 hours
This is somewhat relevent
Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
Do any UK parks not have a system in place?I guess having a flawed system in place beats having no system at all
I think you would know better than me! I've only heard of the system at Merlin parks thoughDo any UK parks not have a system in place?
Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk
I've actually not used it at non Merlin parks.I think you would know better than me! I've only heard of the system at Merlin parks though
It would probably be legal assuming they didn't retain the data but I don't think it would be of any use.ITT: "Ew, the dirty disabled people are getting in the way of my rides. They should be shunned and only allowed to visit when I can't see them".
In the spirit of reforming the system, I wonder how legal it would be for the park to require the RAP user to be in receipt of PIP/DLA, with proof of the number of points awarded during assessment?
Going back to the penalising families by having a 1:1 system, I still think the way round is to have the family wait in the main queue, then give the batcher the rap card and then the disabled guest can wait at the exit and get on with their family. This would also help with RAP taking seats other guests have queued for.
When I was at Chessington the other day they were saying to people who didn't have high rate DLA/pip printed on their assessment to just being a doctors letter instead.... The whole point of this change as far as I was aware was to restrict RAP to people who really need it and staff encouraging people to bypass it in order to save complaints.Well not everybody on PIP/DLA has had an assessment, but they do already require proof of being in receipt of said benefit for a carer pass.
ITT: "Ew, the dirty disabled people are getting in the way of my rides. They should be shunned and only allowed to visit when I can't see them".
(and plenty of RAP users use the main que when they are on time out)
Well not everybody on PIP/DLA has had an assessment, but they do already require proof of being in receipt of said benefit for a carer pass.
That's not true as not every RAP user has a physical disability.If you are using the normal queue lines, then you clearly don't need to use RAP.
That's not true as not every RAP user has a physical disability.
My comment was directed at all regardless of disability. Especially if you are flittering alternatively between the RAP and main queue lines to maximise your day.
I mentioned on here last year that I was asked to move from the rear seats of Thirteen to swap seats with some RAP users. Despite the fact that the main queue line was more than 30 minutes wait, for what other reason other than to cheat the system, the RAP users has chosen to join the main queue and manage to queue in the main queue line. Obviously this undermines the system.
The discussion on this thread over the last few weeks have been about people abusing the system as oppose to who can and can't use the RAP and why regardless of the nature of disability. The RAP should be a life line for those that need it and not for people to pick and choose which queue line to use when it suites them to up their ride counts.
Go with someone, register for rap and get a band and try main queue?I'm at loggerheads at the moment because I don't think I need to use the RAP anymore as I can use stairs and have got better with queueing, and generally just don't like using it, but my parents still want me to use it as I'm entitled to it because they don't want to queue for ages. Any advice?
Even if the queue is just 15 mins they'll insist that I use the band.Go with someone, register for rap and get a band and try main queue?
Sent from my Swift 2 Plus using Tapatalk