They could in theory say £1 to replace a certain doorbell is large capex spending...They choose what a 'large' investment is, that's the problem. And they have repeatedly played around with their CAPEX so I don't think it's particularly meaningful anyway. I hope one day @Matt N that you develop the same disdain for Merlin and their terrible business model as some of us I'm glad you've noticed this though, it's a good start
I don't think Merlin's business model is bad. In fact, it's very good that all of the company's RTPs get major investment every couple of years. It's better than companies like Six Flags and Cedar Fair, where the flagship parks (e.g. SFMM, Cedar Point) prosper, with major investments every 2 years, and the smaller properties (e.g. Great Escape, Michigan's Adventure) have not seen major CAPEX in over 10 years. I'm sure those parks will get major CAPEX eventually, it's just that I think they've gone a bit too long without major CAPEX.I hope one day @Matt N that you develop the same disdain for Merlin and their terrible business model as some of us I'm glad you've noticed this though, it's a good start
The way the company was built mean that it was almost inevitable.There's a simple solution to that... why didn't they just stay private instead of going public?
Wasn't merlin built funded by Blackstone?The way the company was built mean that it was almost inevitable.
Blackstone were a key player, as were CVC and obviously KIRKBI, by default.Wasn't merlin built funded by Blackstone?
Kirkbi still own 29.9% of merlin so at least there's some rational voting but not much.Blackstone were a key player, as were CVC and obviously KIRKBI, by default.
Public doesn't = evil, as it were - but it does force you to live and exhibit certain behaviours, some of which that do not go particularly hand in hand with this industry.
Exactly, but the very idea that Kirkbi aren't wanting maximum return is laughable too. They have a diverse portfolio for a reason.Kirkbi still own 29.9% of merlin so at least there's some rational voting but not much.
I'm more thinking they would want to ensure the Lego brand stays high in he public mind, but I assume Lego as have a pull out clause in their contact with merlin as a safety measure.Exactly, but the very idea that Kirkbi aren't wanting maximum return is laughable too. They have a diverse portfolio for a reason.
They could sell, but that wouldn't be advantageous at the moment - (depending on what they acquired their slice of the pie for) and for control reasons too.I'm more thinking they would want to ensure the Lego brand stays high in he public mind, but I assume Lego as have a pull out clause in their contact with merlin as a safety measure.
Blackstone were a key player, as were CVC and obviously KIRKBI, by default.
Public doesn't = evil, as it were - but it does force you to live and exhibit certain behaviours, some of which that do not go particularly hand in hand with this industry.
I get the whole 'never go public' argument but it really doesn't stack up.
The initial MBO was funded by Apax, but Merlin becoming the Merlin we know today (involved in the theme park industry) was all Blackstone. They funded the Legoland purchase and subsequent purchases (Garda, Tussauds etc).I though it was a management buyout funded by some dodgy venture capitalists? Didn't blackstone come in later?
Apax = lots of fish and two dungeons. Blackstone = global empire.So that's a yes then?
@matthewgcole , query for you, do you really expect it to reach 400p now? The so called recovery last month is no more...