This is the heart of the matter ... Machine says A, human thinks B.I’ve been in the cabin and can’t remember the CCTV screen layout. I would of thought the PLC would of alert the operator when train 3 didn’t arrive at the base of lift 2 even before train 4 got stopped at the top of lift 1.
Most of the Smiler structure looks permanently stressed.
On a well engineered ride (not suggesting you can count Smiler there), the structure shouldn't be able to be stressed by any forces that the ride can put upon itself, either routinely or by exception.
I use B&M as an example, as they are regarded as some of the best engineered. But even the best engineering cannot escape the laws of physics and the reality of material science.
I'm not sure if you're implying the collision was the result of one individual. If so, I cannot agree with that position. There was a whole chain of failures and missed opportunities that should've prevented it from happening.Electrical technician A was seemingly complacent
I'm not sure if you're implying the collision was the result of one individual. If so, I cannot agree with that position. There was a whole chain of failures and missed opportunities that should've prevented it from happening.
I completely agree, it was a whole team of people and not just one individual.I'm not sure if you're implying the collision was the result of one individual. If so, I cannot agree with that position. There was a whole chain of failures and missed opportunities that should've prevented it from happening.
That's quite literally every single catastrophic event, even incidents like German wings 9525 can be described as an issue with multiple failure pointsI'm not sure if you're implying the collision was the result of one individual. If so, I cannot agree with that position. There was a whole chain of failures and missed opportunities that should've prevented it from happening.
Electrical technician A was seemingly complacent...
I'm not sure if you're implying the collision was the result of one individual. If so, I cannot agree with that position. There was a whole chain of failures and missed opportunities that should've prevented it from happening.
I completely agree, it was a whole team of people and not just one individual.
On all rides at Towers there is a double-sided Green "Ride Operations" / Red "Technical Services" sign in the operators cabin / by the ride controls. Depending on which side of this sign is visible states who has control of the ride.
When Technical Services attend a ride for any reason (e.g. a fault, to add / remove trains etc) the operator signs the ride over to them & turns the sign from green to red. Whilst the sign is red, the operator is not allowed to do anything with the ride controls. They remain in the Op cabin just to answer the phone / manage hosts breaks (which normally continue during a stoppage). When Technical Services have finished with the ride, they sign it back to the Ride Operations and turn the sign back to green. Only then can the operator touch the controls again.
If Technical Services sign the ride back to Ride Operations but mistakenly leave the sign on red, then they have to be called back to the ride to turn it to green. The operator cannot turn it over themselves. At the end of the day, when the ride is cleared of guests & the power turned off, the operator turns the sign to red to hand the ride over to Technical Services for the night.
So which position this sign was in at the time of the crash would narrow the blame down somewhat. If it was red, the buck stops with Technical Services. If it was green, then it's Ride Operations. Both the Head of Technical Services & the Head of Ride Operations at the time have both since left the business.
the smiler has new speakers. around the batwing area/ exit path there is some new loud speakers which is great bc it usually quite quiet around there and then also around the smiler including the xsector entrance which was already fairly loud but now its louder!!!!!