Towers freak
TS Member
Danza91 said:
Sell his soul to the AMPAS?
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks.
TST Film Review Thread
- Thread starter D4n
- Start date
Sell his soul to the AMPAS?
D4n
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Zadra
Amour
Just watched this on DVD recently. It's undoubtedly one of the most harrowing, depressing films that I've ever forced myself to sit through, and I think more films like this should be made. It's an art form that should reflect the troubles and realities of everyday life for many people, and it's sad that the vast majority of modern movies seem interested only in box office revenue (Grown-Ups 2, After Earth, This Is The End before laughably pathetic examples of this).
The film deals with the emotional trauma of an elderly couple as one of them suffers a stroke and gradually begins to lose memory and bodily functions... there is no 'light at the end of the tunnel', no happy ending, no warped movie reality. This is the real world; and it's genius. Saying anything more might ruin the film, so I won't, but don't just watch this film, check out Michael Haneke. He's also directed the equally brilliant Caché (Hidden) and Funny Games (both the original and the remake, but watch the original).
****
Dallas Buyers Club
I saw this at a preview screening a few weeks back and, since the whole point of free screenings is to encourage word of mouth... well, I feel obliged. The acting in this film is outstanding, I've never especially rated Matthew McConaughey as an actor, and after "Elektra" and didn't think I could ever take Jennifer Garner even remotely seriously, but they're both excellent here. Outshone, nonetheless, by Jared Leto as a transvestite who befriends McConaughey's character as he slowly "dies" of HIV, and attempts to import an effective "cure" from Mexico, which is illegal in the US due to the corrupt healthcare system.
This film (based on truth) speaks volumes about the importance of democracy and equality, and I'm pleased it has received such a good deal of attention in terms of Oscar nominations. Although I'd certainly pick "Gravity" ahead of it in terms of being a more entertaining film (Dallas Buyers is at least 20 minutes too long) the weight of the performances propels it into a league with the big-boys.
****
Just watched this on DVD recently. It's undoubtedly one of the most harrowing, depressing films that I've ever forced myself to sit through, and I think more films like this should be made. It's an art form that should reflect the troubles and realities of everyday life for many people, and it's sad that the vast majority of modern movies seem interested only in box office revenue (Grown-Ups 2, After Earth, This Is The End before laughably pathetic examples of this).
The film deals with the emotional trauma of an elderly couple as one of them suffers a stroke and gradually begins to lose memory and bodily functions... there is no 'light at the end of the tunnel', no happy ending, no warped movie reality. This is the real world; and it's genius. Saying anything more might ruin the film, so I won't, but don't just watch this film, check out Michael Haneke. He's also directed the equally brilliant Caché (Hidden) and Funny Games (both the original and the remake, but watch the original).
****
Dallas Buyers Club
I saw this at a preview screening a few weeks back and, since the whole point of free screenings is to encourage word of mouth... well, I feel obliged. The acting in this film is outstanding, I've never especially rated Matthew McConaughey as an actor, and after "Elektra" and didn't think I could ever take Jennifer Garner even remotely seriously, but they're both excellent here. Outshone, nonetheless, by Jared Leto as a transvestite who befriends McConaughey's character as he slowly "dies" of HIV, and attempts to import an effective "cure" from Mexico, which is illegal in the US due to the corrupt healthcare system.
This film (based on truth) speaks volumes about the importance of democracy and equality, and I'm pleased it has received such a good deal of attention in terms of Oscar nominations. Although I'd certainly pick "Gravity" ahead of it in terms of being a more entertaining film (Dallas Buyers is at least 20 minutes too long) the weight of the performances propels it into a league with the big-boys.
****
Towers freak
TS Member
Not really a film Per se but I believe I should mention it:
GhostWatch
On Halloween night in 1992 BBC one showed a Mockentary drama represented as a live broadcast of a paranormal investigation from a suburban house in Northolt, where poltergeist activity was believed to be taking place. Due to a film on ITV finishing after the begining credits many viewers who switched to BBC 1 missed the writing credit precluding to the fact it was fiction and believed it to be fact. What made it more convincing was the use of Sarah Greene, Michael Parkinson and Craig Charles respectively "presenting" the show from a studio and "on location" adding to the realism. The film caused controversy due to many people being fooled and children having nightmares (besides the fact it was shown after the watershed) and was even banned from being rebroadcast for 10 years.
Some of the acting is wooden (mainly Sarah Greene) but the majority is rather good especially from Michael Parkinson. That apart Ghostwatch is rather convincing as a real programme and it is quite understandable why people were fooled into believing it was real. Nothing much happens for about 40 mins which adds to the tension but when everything kicks off it's rather scary.
8/10
*****
The Stuff
A delicious mysterious goo that oozes from the Earth is marketed as the newest dessert sensation but The Stuff is not as it appears to be.
The acting isn't too bad for a film with a B-movie style story and the effects are rather good for a 80's budget horror. The story isn't the most interesting but with our marketing and junk food culture, the moral suggestions hinted in the film resonate even more than ever today. One thing that does age the film somewhat is the Army character who is fooled to believe the stuff is being used by communists to brainwash Americans.
6/10
****
Spontaneous Combustion
A man discovers his parents were volunteer test subjects for a trial drug that prevents radiation poisoning but soon after he is born they spontaneously combust. He soon discovers he has mental powers to start fires.
The story doesn't make sense and is full of plot holes that leave you confused by the end. Except for an excellent main performance from Brad Douriff, some really cool fire effects and a great cameo from director John Landis there isn't much going for it. Watch it for some mindless entertainment but if you want a serious film with a good plot then this is not the film for you.
4/10
GhostWatch
On Halloween night in 1992 BBC one showed a Mockentary drama represented as a live broadcast of a paranormal investigation from a suburban house in Northolt, where poltergeist activity was believed to be taking place. Due to a film on ITV finishing after the begining credits many viewers who switched to BBC 1 missed the writing credit precluding to the fact it was fiction and believed it to be fact. What made it more convincing was the use of Sarah Greene, Michael Parkinson and Craig Charles respectively "presenting" the show from a studio and "on location" adding to the realism. The film caused controversy due to many people being fooled and children having nightmares (besides the fact it was shown after the watershed) and was even banned from being rebroadcast for 10 years.
Some of the acting is wooden (mainly Sarah Greene) but the majority is rather good especially from Michael Parkinson. That apart Ghostwatch is rather convincing as a real programme and it is quite understandable why people were fooled into believing it was real. Nothing much happens for about 40 mins which adds to the tension but when everything kicks off it's rather scary.
8/10
*****
The Stuff
A delicious mysterious goo that oozes from the Earth is marketed as the newest dessert sensation but The Stuff is not as it appears to be.
The acting isn't too bad for a film with a B-movie style story and the effects are rather good for a 80's budget horror. The story isn't the most interesting but with our marketing and junk food culture, the moral suggestions hinted in the film resonate even more than ever today. One thing that does age the film somewhat is the Army character who is fooled to believe the stuff is being used by communists to brainwash Americans.
6/10
****
Spontaneous Combustion
A man discovers his parents were volunteer test subjects for a trial drug that prevents radiation poisoning but soon after he is born they spontaneously combust. He soon discovers he has mental powers to start fires.
The story doesn't make sense and is full of plot holes that leave you confused by the end. Except for an excellent main performance from Brad Douriff, some really cool fire effects and a great cameo from director John Landis there isn't much going for it. Watch it for some mindless entertainment but if you want a serious film with a good plot then this is not the film for you.
4/10
Harv
TS Member
The Great Gatsby
Recently bought this on Google Play as it's on my IB Reading List and I liked the look of it. I do not regret buying it. The film is swish and swanky; it doesn't uproot the story and plonk it in modern day but the entire "roaring 20's" vibe receives a slick brushing up - they could have been really cliche but the modernized urban soundtrack really works in accordance with the atmosphere. It had a crazy OTT feel, particularly during the scene in Myrtle's apartment, but it really worked considering that some scenes were very much down to earth and sombre. A really zesty, contemporary and reviving blend of themes.
The cast were spectacular, and contrary to my friends who have also seen the film, I thought that the role of Tom was delivered brilliantly. It was odd to see an actor who I recognized so well as Spiderman assume the role of a 20's bond trader but Toby Maguire was truly great. DiCaprio, whilst brilliant, did not to me convey the full extent of Gatsby's emotional range and I feel there are ways that his character could have been better developed.
Nonetheless, a solid 9/10 from me.
The Lego Movie
Was it just me who really didn't get this all that much? It came together better as it went on, but left me a little perplexed with the in-your-face approach. They could have really played the nostalgia card with Will Ferrell's character and not taken any of the fun out of the film for kids, yet the film seemed shy of reaching any kind of emotional height for the adults and consequently felt a little shallow.
I know it's a film for kids but allegedly so is Up, and that is a film that needs no explaining. It had a few laughs and everyone wants to live in a city made of Lego, I guess. And the CGI was pretty darn good. And the characters were quite likeable. And the song.
I give it a fair 6.5/10
Lincoln
I'm studying higher level history as one of my IB subjects which covers the American Civil War and more importantly, US politics. Now, if you're expecting an epic biopic, depicting Lincoln's life and showing his wartime leadership, you're probably setting yourself up for this wrong. It shows an America towards the end of the Civil War, set towards a Northern victory, and focuses on Lincoln's struggle to pass the slavery amendment before the South makes peace and spoils his hopes of abolition.
Daniel Day-Lewis is brilliant as the quiet, wise yet emotive Abraham Lincoln. He is depicted as calm and gentle but with no end of determination and his plight is rousing. The home life of the president is also shown which I found interesting.
The sets are great and the music is too. It's all very solemn and wordy and less full of action than I'd hoped yet explosive Civil War scenes are replaced by mesmerising lectures from good 'ole Abe to his men. The themes of regret and haste and foreboding worry against bravery are all very present. It's a nerve wracking film even though we all know what happens in the end.
If you want to understand the US and see the true story of the abolition of evil, it's definitely worth a watch and worthy of a 9/10.
Recently bought this on Google Play as it's on my IB Reading List and I liked the look of it. I do not regret buying it. The film is swish and swanky; it doesn't uproot the story and plonk it in modern day but the entire "roaring 20's" vibe receives a slick brushing up - they could have been really cliche but the modernized urban soundtrack really works in accordance with the atmosphere. It had a crazy OTT feel, particularly during the scene in Myrtle's apartment, but it really worked considering that some scenes were very much down to earth and sombre. A really zesty, contemporary and reviving blend of themes.
The cast were spectacular, and contrary to my friends who have also seen the film, I thought that the role of Tom was delivered brilliantly. It was odd to see an actor who I recognized so well as Spiderman assume the role of a 20's bond trader but Toby Maguire was truly great. DiCaprio, whilst brilliant, did not to me convey the full extent of Gatsby's emotional range and I feel there are ways that his character could have been better developed.
Nonetheless, a solid 9/10 from me.
The Lego Movie
Was it just me who really didn't get this all that much? It came together better as it went on, but left me a little perplexed with the in-your-face approach. They could have really played the nostalgia card with Will Ferrell's character and not taken any of the fun out of the film for kids, yet the film seemed shy of reaching any kind of emotional height for the adults and consequently felt a little shallow.
I know it's a film for kids but allegedly so is Up, and that is a film that needs no explaining. It had a few laughs and everyone wants to live in a city made of Lego, I guess. And the CGI was pretty darn good. And the characters were quite likeable. And the song.
I give it a fair 6.5/10
Lincoln
I'm studying higher level history as one of my IB subjects which covers the American Civil War and more importantly, US politics. Now, if you're expecting an epic biopic, depicting Lincoln's life and showing his wartime leadership, you're probably setting yourself up for this wrong. It shows an America towards the end of the Civil War, set towards a Northern victory, and focuses on Lincoln's struggle to pass the slavery amendment before the South makes peace and spoils his hopes of abolition.
Daniel Day-Lewis is brilliant as the quiet, wise yet emotive Abraham Lincoln. He is depicted as calm and gentle but with no end of determination and his plight is rousing. The home life of the president is also shown which I found interesting.
The sets are great and the music is too. It's all very solemn and wordy and less full of action than I'd hoped yet explosive Civil War scenes are replaced by mesmerising lectures from good 'ole Abe to his men. The themes of regret and haste and foreboding worry against bravery are all very present. It's a nerve wracking film even though we all know what happens in the end.
If you want to understand the US and see the true story of the abolition of evil, it's definitely worth a watch and worthy of a 9/10.
Danza91
TS Member
12 Years a Slave
It is powerful, and shocking that this was allowed to happen, and certain scenes are hard to watch, however, I personally don't think it was the 'Best Film' - it only won that due to the subject matter. At times it is a bit slow and the script is weak, and it feels a bit patronising at times.
Still a good film, but flawed.
***
It is powerful, and shocking that this was allowed to happen, and certain scenes are hard to watch, however, I personally don't think it was the 'Best Film' - it only won that due to the subject matter. At times it is a bit slow and the script is weak, and it feels a bit patronising at times.
Still a good film, but flawed.
***
Tarin Maria
TS Member
Eraserhead
I dunno what happened here, but I liked it... Just, go watch it and make up your own mind...
???????????
7.5/10
I dunno what happened here, but I liked it... Just, go watch it and make up your own mind...
???????????
7.5/10
Tarin Maria
TS Member
Oculus
I'm not sure where to start with this film. It took elements from many areas of horror, with a very Japanese-like time ordering, and the creepiness of a film like Mama, and gore more like an American film. What leads this film to be marked down is the time ordering. It would skip between two eras in two interlocking stories, unlike in most Japanese films which will tell you that you have gone back or forward in time, Oculus did it without any warning, and often left me scratching my head. The film as a whole was just a giant mind f**k, in an intelligent way though.
It is a film you have to focus on, as it can get confusing. It is also well acted and well scripted. Karen Gillan plays a main character, which is a bit disturbing as she has to have an American accent the whole way through, and its less convincing than it should be. Absolutely heaps of tension, and very few jump scares, which works to Oculus' advantage in some ways, as huge amounts of jump scares might cheapen the feel of the film.
Overall a well executed film, worth a watch if you can keep up with it
7.5/10
I'm not sure where to start with this film. It took elements from many areas of horror, with a very Japanese-like time ordering, and the creepiness of a film like Mama, and gore more like an American film. What leads this film to be marked down is the time ordering. It would skip between two eras in two interlocking stories, unlike in most Japanese films which will tell you that you have gone back or forward in time, Oculus did it without any warning, and often left me scratching my head. The film as a whole was just a giant mind f**k, in an intelligent way though.
It is a film you have to focus on, as it can get confusing. It is also well acted and well scripted. Karen Gillan plays a main character, which is a bit disturbing as she has to have an American accent the whole way through, and its less convincing than it should be. Absolutely heaps of tension, and very few jump scares, which works to Oculus' advantage in some ways, as huge amounts of jump scares might cheapen the feel of the film.
Overall a well executed film, worth a watch if you can keep up with it
7.5/10
Tarin Maria
TS Member
Yeah, and it was boring...
Joke, Oculus is in the cinema, so not that strange...
Joke, Oculus is in the cinema, so not that strange...
Towers freak
TS Member
22 Jump Street
Spoiler Free
Certainly one of the best comedies I have seen in a long time (probably since 21 Jump Street). Not all the jokes worked but 90% did and were rather clever with some silly but not over the top, stuff thrown in for good measure. I properly belly laughed over 6 times (most of these in the first 20 mins) which for me makes a successful comedy. The middle of the second act is not as strong as the first or the last but is certainly strong enough to prevent becoming bored although it was quite dead at times, down to some jokes not working. The script is well written and the film well shot with some great uses of split screen for comedic effect. You will want to stick around for the end credits if you usually don't, as the best jokes are during these credits, which in this case isn't a bad thing. If Phil Lord and Christopher Miller can carry on directing great comedy and animated films, then I'll certainly carry on watching them.
8.5/10
Spoiler Free
Certainly one of the best comedies I have seen in a long time (probably since 21 Jump Street). Not all the jokes worked but 90% did and were rather clever with some silly but not over the top, stuff thrown in for good measure. I properly belly laughed over 6 times (most of these in the first 20 mins) which for me makes a successful comedy. The middle of the second act is not as strong as the first or the last but is certainly strong enough to prevent becoming bored although it was quite dead at times, down to some jokes not working. The script is well written and the film well shot with some great uses of split screen for comedic effect. You will want to stick around for the end credits if you usually don't, as the best jokes are during these credits, which in this case isn't a bad thing. If Phil Lord and Christopher Miller can carry on directing great comedy and animated films, then I'll certainly carry on watching them.
8.5/10
Irish Chris
TS Member
Transformers Age of Extinction
The first thing I thought after I left the cinema was, Michael Bay must have a serious explosion fetish. And that sums up this film perfectly in one sentence.
The film is too long at 2 and a half hours, the plot stops 90 minutes in and the last hour is a blur of explosions and fast panning camera movements. Its so intense at stage you think you're on a rollercoaster. The last hour is reminiscent of the final scene of Man of Steel between Superman and Zod, where it is overily long, has too many explosions and way too much cgi destruction!
The first 90 minutes of the film is not bad and shows it's not all about blowing stuff up for the sake of it. The last hour is such a let down.
5/10
The first thing I thought after I left the cinema was, Michael Bay must have a serious explosion fetish. And that sums up this film perfectly in one sentence.
The film is too long at 2 and a half hours, the plot stops 90 minutes in and the last hour is a blur of explosions and fast panning camera movements. Its so intense at stage you think you're on a rollercoaster. The last hour is reminiscent of the final scene of Man of Steel between Superman and Zod, where it is overily long, has too many explosions and way too much cgi destruction!
The first 90 minutes of the film is not bad and shows it's not all about blowing stuff up for the sake of it. The last hour is such a let down.
5/10
Rose Of Dawn
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Eejanaika (Fuji-Q Highland)
After trying Arthur im Königreich der Minimoys at EP last week, I decided to give the original film another try. Whilst it's not perfect, it seemed more enjoyable after doing the ride. I've also now watched the little-known Arthur sequels (which get rid of the majority of the celebrity voices, except Snoop Dogg for some reason). In the UK, both these films are edited together and are called 'Arthur and the Great Adventure'; after watching them, it makes sense to do that as there isn't enough to really stretch them out over two films.
Arthur and the Revenge of Malthazar
By far the worst of the three films. It is nothing more than a set-up for the final part of the trilogy, and as a result it feels like not a lot really goes on. Many of the main characters don't even show up until the last 30 minutes, and when Malthazar finally appears he just explains his plan (in a needlessly lengthy monologue) then executes it.
The only things of note in this film is that it's quite heavily referenced in Arthur im Königreich der Minimoys - a lot of the first scenes of the ride are taken from the opening of this film, along with everything from Paradise Alley (although the film makers remembered to censor Still D.R.E, something EP forgot to do).
Arthur and the War of the Two Worlds
Surprisingly enjoyable compared to the other Arthur films. There's more story in this, and the plot is fairly daft, but it's certainly watchable. The ending seems a bit lacking, though, as once Malthazar is stopped they just eat some pie and the credits roll.
Arthur and the Revenge of Malthazar
By far the worst of the three films. It is nothing more than a set-up for the final part of the trilogy, and as a result it feels like not a lot really goes on. Many of the main characters don't even show up until the last 30 minutes, and when Malthazar finally appears he just explains his plan (in a needlessly lengthy monologue) then executes it.
The only things of note in this film is that it's quite heavily referenced in Arthur im Königreich der Minimoys - a lot of the first scenes of the ride are taken from the opening of this film, along with everything from Paradise Alley (although the film makers remembered to censor Still D.R.E, something EP forgot to do).
Arthur and the War of the Two Worlds
Surprisingly enjoyable compared to the other Arthur films. There's more story in this, and the plot is fairly daft, but it's certainly watchable. The ending seems a bit lacking, though, as once Malthazar is stopped they just eat some pie and the credits roll.
Jonathan
TS Member
- Favourite Ride
- Helix <3
The LEGO Movie
I was rather sceptical when it was announced that a movie based around Lego was going to be made. However, when more details were released, my interest was piqued. I saw it at the cinema back in February, and it was probably the funniest film I've seen in years! It's got a lot in there for kids, but it's easy for adults to enjoy as well. With the animation, I love how it's faithful to what Lego is like in real life, and the sea is a good usage of this. The references to old Lego sets are good, too. One thing I liked was the attention to detail on some of the characters, in particular Benny, who is based on a minifig from a 1980s space-themed set. His helmet is cracked at the bottom, which suggests his age for those who are unfamiliar with old Lego sets. It's fully deserving of many award nominations, and I'm gladly giving it a 10/10.
Les Misérables (2012)
I know I've never seen the stage show (and this is something I desire to change next year), but I first saw the 25th Anniversary Special a while back when I was at uni, and was instantly hooked. I went to see the film when it was released last year at its first regular showing at the cinema in Truro (Falmouth was closer, but for some reason, the website for the cinema there wouldn't accept my card). It was stunning. Some of the songs were changed in terms of positioning, but the one that worked the best was moving 'I Dreamed A Dream' to go after 'Lovely Ladies' instead of before. I find this works better for the storyline, as in the film, it's more suggestive that Fantine is singing it as a lament due to the fact that she's had to resort to prostitution in order to send the Thénardiers more money to help her daughter, Cosette. I've seen it several times, and I'm not exactly too keen on Russell Crowe as Javert, but it could've been worse. In my view, it was a pretty good adaptation of the musical. 8/10
Rush
The film tells the story of one of the greatest rivalries that Formula 1 has ever seen - that between Niki Lauda and James Hunt, with particular focus on the 1976 season, when the rivalry was at its most intense. One of the biggest events in this season was a very serious crash for Lauda at the Nürbürgring Nordschleife during the German GP, in which he suffered severe burns and almost lost his life. He was back behind the wheel about thirty days after this. There are a couple of inaccuracies here and there, with the rivalry between the two drivers being somewhat exaggerated, but if biographical films were 100% accurate to their source material, then they'd probably be rather boring. 8/10
Ghostbusters
I only saw this film back in April on the night before leaving London for the Junket trip. Yes, I know you're all thinking 'How did it take you so long to watch it?' It was worth the wait. It's not the best film I've seen, but I'm glad I've seen it. Pretty funny in places, and I'd happily watch it again. 7/10
Back to the Future (Parts 1 and 2)
Yet again, I only saw these films for the first time back in April after having returned to London. I was staying with Diogo and Hils, and we started watching the episode of Family Guy which parodies a load of stuff from the films. Diogo then decided that I was to watch them. I don't know what took me so long to do it! They were both brilliant! I do prefer the first one, mind, as it's less of a headf**k in terms of the time travel aspect, and I'm yet to see the third, but I can see why the films are so popular. Part 1 - 9/10 Part 2 - 8/10
I was rather sceptical when it was announced that a movie based around Lego was going to be made. However, when more details were released, my interest was piqued. I saw it at the cinema back in February, and it was probably the funniest film I've seen in years! It's got a lot in there for kids, but it's easy for adults to enjoy as well. With the animation, I love how it's faithful to what Lego is like in real life, and the sea is a good usage of this. The references to old Lego sets are good, too. One thing I liked was the attention to detail on some of the characters, in particular Benny, who is based on a minifig from a 1980s space-themed set. His helmet is cracked at the bottom, which suggests his age for those who are unfamiliar with old Lego sets. It's fully deserving of many award nominations, and I'm gladly giving it a 10/10.
Les Misérables (2012)
I know I've never seen the stage show (and this is something I desire to change next year), but I first saw the 25th Anniversary Special a while back when I was at uni, and was instantly hooked. I went to see the film when it was released last year at its first regular showing at the cinema in Truro (Falmouth was closer, but for some reason, the website for the cinema there wouldn't accept my card). It was stunning. Some of the songs were changed in terms of positioning, but the one that worked the best was moving 'I Dreamed A Dream' to go after 'Lovely Ladies' instead of before. I find this works better for the storyline, as in the film, it's more suggestive that Fantine is singing it as a lament due to the fact that she's had to resort to prostitution in order to send the Thénardiers more money to help her daughter, Cosette. I've seen it several times, and I'm not exactly too keen on Russell Crowe as Javert, but it could've been worse. In my view, it was a pretty good adaptation of the musical. 8/10
Rush
The film tells the story of one of the greatest rivalries that Formula 1 has ever seen - that between Niki Lauda and James Hunt, with particular focus on the 1976 season, when the rivalry was at its most intense. One of the biggest events in this season was a very serious crash for Lauda at the Nürbürgring Nordschleife during the German GP, in which he suffered severe burns and almost lost his life. He was back behind the wheel about thirty days after this. There are a couple of inaccuracies here and there, with the rivalry between the two drivers being somewhat exaggerated, but if biographical films were 100% accurate to their source material, then they'd probably be rather boring. 8/10
Ghostbusters
I only saw this film back in April on the night before leaving London for the Junket trip. Yes, I know you're all thinking 'How did it take you so long to watch it?' It was worth the wait. It's not the best film I've seen, but I'm glad I've seen it. Pretty funny in places, and I'd happily watch it again. 7/10
Back to the Future (Parts 1 and 2)
Yet again, I only saw these films for the first time back in April after having returned to London. I was staying with Diogo and Hils, and we started watching the episode of Family Guy which parodies a load of stuff from the films. Diogo then decided that I was to watch them. I don't know what took me so long to do it! They were both brilliant! I do prefer the first one, mind, as it's less of a headf**k in terms of the time travel aspect, and I'm yet to see the third, but I can see why the films are so popular. Part 1 - 9/10 Part 2 - 8/10
Tarin Maria
TS Member
I don't think I've ever reviewed these two on here, so have decided, since I'm thinking about doing some film reviews on YouTube to give an overall here.
Also, these are two films I truly enjoy and love.
2001 Maniacs
I'm not sure where to start with this one. At first the plot can seem like a typical American horror, and I guess most of it is. Basically a bunch of American college (uni) students wind up in this strange little town called Pleasant Valley on their way to Daytona Beach. The locals at first seem nice and welcoming, and from the get go tell these kids they are 'the guests of honour' at their annual barbecue. The mayor of the town is played by Robert Englund, who is also Freddy Krugar in the original Nightmare on Elm Street films. As per usual he brings a wonderfully comedic performance. As the film progresses, all of the kids start to die in some really brutal ways. However the mix of gore, laughs and sex is perfect for what is essentially a slasher with a twist. Of course, what the kids don't realise is that they are for eats at the annual barbecue. Its a great film, with almost no CGI whatsoever, all the killings are done with good, old fashioned special effects, the minimal amount of CGI is a smart decision on the directors part.
I really don't think the IMDB rating is kind enough to this film. Its got a decent enough twist, the scripting is pretty good, and the acting (for a horror film) is also decent.
A funny, gory film, really re-watchable. Also, Robert Englund.
9/10
My second film might raise eyebrows, but here goes................
A Serbian Film
I see you all, sitting there, silently judging me through the computer screen.
Okay, give me a chance, cause actually, it is a brilliant film.
Do I need to explain the plot? A semi retired porn star in Serbia is running a bit low on cash, and is offered one final job that would secure his family, until the death of his son, financially. But then sh*t goes down.
This film has genuinely likable characters to start with. Even the antagonist is awesome. He is the definition of charismatic, and crazy, plus his name is Vukmir Vukmir (MHM). The protagonist is Milos. He's actually not crazy, and he actually opposes the film when bad things start to happen. They get him to do these things by drugging him.
This film's production values are huge, the special effects are pretty realistic in most places, and I guess that's why it's so disturbing to some people. The acting is also really good throughout, Sergej Trifunovic (Vukmir) definitely gives the best performance with his huge rant halfway through the film. I think more people should focus on the subject of this rant, as it actually does give some credence to all of the atrocities and taboos within the film.
Talking of atrocities and taboos, I think we all know the three scenes that are really 'shocking' and 'difficult to watch'. The newborn, the beheading and the son. Now, yes, I understand, these scenes are shocking. But to understand their reason, you have to understand the context, which is where I think this film falls flat with most viewers. If the goriest films you have seen are Saw or Hostel, A Serbian Film really just isn't for you. If the most intelligent film you've seen is Inception, you're probably not going to understand the social commentary behind this.
I say this in a kind way, because if both of those things are true, you are going to struggle.
A dark, clever and well made film. Not for anyone sensitive.
8.5/10
Also, if you're thinking about starting to watch something like A Serbian Film, but you've not really delved into extreme cinema before, I recommend watching Funny Games and Martyrs before this. Funny games for its social commentary (and the original Austrian version, not the American shot by shot remake) and Martyrs because it is just generally a good film, plus the gore is pretty extreme.
Note: I watched A Serbian Film at 14... So it may be that I'm just desensitised now.
Also, these are two films I truly enjoy and love.
2001 Maniacs
I'm not sure where to start with this one. At first the plot can seem like a typical American horror, and I guess most of it is. Basically a bunch of American college (uni) students wind up in this strange little town called Pleasant Valley on their way to Daytona Beach. The locals at first seem nice and welcoming, and from the get go tell these kids they are 'the guests of honour' at their annual barbecue. The mayor of the town is played by Robert Englund, who is also Freddy Krugar in the original Nightmare on Elm Street films. As per usual he brings a wonderfully comedic performance. As the film progresses, all of the kids start to die in some really brutal ways. However the mix of gore, laughs and sex is perfect for what is essentially a slasher with a twist. Of course, what the kids don't realise is that they are for eats at the annual barbecue. Its a great film, with almost no CGI whatsoever, all the killings are done with good, old fashioned special effects, the minimal amount of CGI is a smart decision on the directors part.
I really don't think the IMDB rating is kind enough to this film. Its got a decent enough twist, the scripting is pretty good, and the acting (for a horror film) is also decent.
A funny, gory film, really re-watchable. Also, Robert Englund.
9/10
My second film might raise eyebrows, but here goes................
A Serbian Film
I see you all, sitting there, silently judging me through the computer screen.
Okay, give me a chance, cause actually, it is a brilliant film.
Do I need to explain the plot? A semi retired porn star in Serbia is running a bit low on cash, and is offered one final job that would secure his family, until the death of his son, financially. But then sh*t goes down.
This film has genuinely likable characters to start with. Even the antagonist is awesome. He is the definition of charismatic, and crazy, plus his name is Vukmir Vukmir (MHM). The protagonist is Milos. He's actually not crazy, and he actually opposes the film when bad things start to happen. They get him to do these things by drugging him.
This film's production values are huge, the special effects are pretty realistic in most places, and I guess that's why it's so disturbing to some people. The acting is also really good throughout, Sergej Trifunovic (Vukmir) definitely gives the best performance with his huge rant halfway through the film. I think more people should focus on the subject of this rant, as it actually does give some credence to all of the atrocities and taboos within the film.
Talking of atrocities and taboos, I think we all know the three scenes that are really 'shocking' and 'difficult to watch'. The newborn, the beheading and the son. Now, yes, I understand, these scenes are shocking. But to understand their reason, you have to understand the context, which is where I think this film falls flat with most viewers. If the goriest films you have seen are Saw or Hostel, A Serbian Film really just isn't for you. If the most intelligent film you've seen is Inception, you're probably not going to understand the social commentary behind this.
I say this in a kind way, because if both of those things are true, you are going to struggle.
A dark, clever and well made film. Not for anyone sensitive.
8.5/10
Also, if you're thinking about starting to watch something like A Serbian Film, but you've not really delved into extreme cinema before, I recommend watching Funny Games and Martyrs before this. Funny games for its social commentary (and the original Austrian version, not the American shot by shot remake) and Martyrs because it is just generally a good film, plus the gore is pretty extreme.
Note: I watched A Serbian Film at 14... So it may be that I'm just desensitised now.
Jem8472
TS Member
Interstellar
I like messing about with the fonts and stuff 
Probably spoilers!I went to see Interstellar on Saturday night in IMAX. I was looking forward to it but I try not to get excited by films as there is too much rubbish pumped out by hollywood and over hyped.
This had one good sign, there was little hype about it. I had seen some interviews with the cast and they were not going over the top about the film. None of this " it will change cinema forever" type stuff, thats what put me off going to see Gravity.
The Earth is dying and humans are struggling to feed themselves.
A new world is needed and a plan is in action to try and get humans to leave this world and find a new home in the stars.
The film starts out gently enough and you get a good feel for the main cast. I thought John Lithgow was excellent as the Grandad.
It is soon shown that something odd is going on in Murphs (the 10 year old daughter) room. It leads Coop (the main character) to working out some coordinates and he and Murph find what is left of NASA. The story now moves really quick, Coop leaves and blasts off to the stars even with a very upset Murph.
I must say that the actress that played the young Murph was really good. I thought she played it very well and was enjoyable to watch. She will probably be an actress to watch out for in the future.
The film is long and after the very quick, discover NASA and we want you to fly etc it settles in to the long part of the near 3 hour film.
I wont really go deeply in to the film as its a bit complex but the film does a very good job explaining all the science and making sure that at the end of the film you are not left scratching your head.
I like the fact that the science in the film is not dumbed down and there is talk about quantum physics, extra dimensions and time travel and time dilation. It is all handled really well and I have been thinking about this film off and on for 24 hours and I can't really pick holes in the time travel element of the film. Its all pretty slick!
The music in the film is excellent, Hans Zimmer normally has a sort of style of music but this is different and there are some really dramatic parts to the film where the music just builds and builds until it is almost shaking the cinema to bits (well it did in the IMAX)
There are some excellent parts in the film where you are sitting on the edge of your seat wondering where the hell this is going. Films don't usually make me jump but there is one bit that made the whole cinema jump.
The ending was good, it is left a little open so there is a hint that there could be a second one. Part of me does not want a second film as this one was so dam good but if they could do it again then it would be amazing!
This is not just an out and out adventure film the main love story is a very big part of the film and it is not over the top. There are some very emotional scenes in this film and like almost everything in the film it is does well and you really feel it.
I was impressed with the whole film, very little green screen was used and there were actual models used in the making of this film.
If you like space and sci-fi you should really go and see this, I think IMAX was well worth the rather expensive £15.95 price.
This so easily could have been a very confusing and badly done film but the end result is excellent, I am tempted to go and see it again and there are not many films I have seen at the cinema more than once!
bluesonichd
TS Member
Hitman: Agent 47
A load of cock
Enough said
A load of cock
Enough said
Danza91
TS Member
BUMP!
Beasts of No Nation - 4/5
Got round to watching this the other day. Absolutely fantastic, gripping, though a hard-intense watch. Idris Elba's performance is flawless too.
The Revenant 3/5
On one hand, spectacular, the other, dull and lifeless. The cinematography and performances are terrific, I've not a problem with all the recognition it is receiving for those, however it's just so bland and dull. It's not tense, it's just tedious and repetitive. Really disappointing and I was very much looking forward to this. Maybe a 2/5, unsure.
Suffragette - 3/5
An inspiring story but couldn't help but feel like it wasn't told the right way. Almost like you know there is tonnes to tell but the film never actually tells it.
Star Wars Episode VII - 4/5
Loved it. Very what I would call safe plot but thought it was just what the franchise needed.
Interstellar - 3/5
Finally watched it last week. Similar to The Revenant with my comments. Beautiful and I loved the soundtrack but slow and dull and felt a bit like 'is that it!?' at the end. I must add it was a real shame for me as I love sci-fis and some of Nolan's previous films are up there with my favourites (Inception in particular) but both his last two films (Interstellar and The Dark Knight Rises) have been very poor in comparison.
Beasts of No Nation - 4/5
Got round to watching this the other day. Absolutely fantastic, gripping, though a hard-intense watch. Idris Elba's performance is flawless too.
The Revenant 3/5
On one hand, spectacular, the other, dull and lifeless. The cinematography and performances are terrific, I've not a problem with all the recognition it is receiving for those, however it's just so bland and dull. It's not tense, it's just tedious and repetitive. Really disappointing and I was very much looking forward to this. Maybe a 2/5, unsure.
Suffragette - 3/5
An inspiring story but couldn't help but feel like it wasn't told the right way. Almost like you know there is tonnes to tell but the film never actually tells it.
Star Wars Episode VII - 4/5
Loved it. Very what I would call safe plot but thought it was just what the franchise needed.
Interstellar - 3/5
Finally watched it last week. Similar to The Revenant with my comments. Beautiful and I loved the soundtrack but slow and dull and felt a bit like 'is that it!?' at the end. I must add it was a real shame for me as I love sci-fis and some of Nolan's previous films are up there with my favourites (Inception in particular) but both his last two films (Interstellar and The Dark Knight Rises) have been very poor in comparison.