The fact-checking and bias point is a very good one.
Because of the way social media works, you will be directed towards things you want to hear and people who agree with you. That can be great in some circumstances, but when looking for relatively unbiased news and discussion, Iād argue that it can sometimes turn things into a bit of an echo chamber and prevent reliably informed discussion and facts. If social media becomes too much of an echo chamber, then the news and facts will naturally become a bit biased, which can sometimes cloud how factual the debate is.
On a forum, on the other hand, you engage with people with all kinds of different opinions and from all different walks of life. Iād argue that the slightly broader house of opinions and people you encounter on a forum makes the discussion and news reporting more unbiased by encouraging good critical thinking and informed debate. The forum not having that echo chamber-type quality that social media can sometimes have ensures that the discussion remains relatively unbiased, in my view.