- News all the latest
- Theme Park explore the park
- Resort tour the resort
- Future looking forward
- History looking back
- Community and meetups
-
ℹ️ Heads up...
This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks. - Thread starter Altonadvocate1
- Start date
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
- Favourite Ride
- The Giant Squid
- Favourite Ride
- Nemesis
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Who do you want to buy Alton Towers?
Skyscraper
TS Member
they would have us enthusiasts to get past first, before they did that!the only companies likely to buy Towers are those that would turn it in to a housing estate.
Poisson
TS Member
You need a group of hedgefunders lead by a board of people with their head screwed on right for theme park investment (realising you have to pump a lot in but you get a lot out if you do so) preferably with an entertainment or theme park background
Andrew
TS Contributor
they would have us enthusiasts to get past first, before they did that!
I don't think a group of enthusiasts would have much fight against a corporate giant whose pockets are lined with precious precious gold in this day and age. Or ever.
BarryZola
TS Member
they would have us enthusiasts to get past first, before they did that!
No. As usual, it would be be Staffs Moorlands Council, who would not give them planning permission (understandably in this case though, if the housing had a direct and lasting negative impact on the historic nature of the place). DIRECT AND LASTING being my important words.
Skyscraper
TS Member
I don't think a group of enthusiasts would have much fight against a corporate giant whose pockets are lined with precious precious gold in this day and age. Or ever.
what i meant was surely someone would start a petition?No. As usual, it would be be Staffs Moorlands Council, who would not give them planning permission (understandably in this case though, if the housing had a direct and lasting negative impact on the historic nature of the place). DIRECT AND LASTING being my important words.
BarryZola
TS Member
Towers is probably the only theme park in Merlin's arsenal that'd stand on it's own well. Also at the moment it is probably the one they'd most likely sell
Why do you think that, out of actual interest? Because they could get a decent price for it out of their initial outlay, or other reasons? Genuinely interested in your thoughts on why, I'm not trying to trap you or anything stupid like that.
BarryZola
TS Member
lets just talk about positive tings now ok![]()
This isn't TowersTimes mate. (Sorry Mods
Matt.GC
TS Member
It would be a good sell due to its heritage (both historical and theme park years). Merlin could want shot due to the PR and financial liability the park has now become for them.Why do you think that, out of actual interest? Because they could get a decent price for it out of their initial outlay, or other reasons? Genuinely interested in your thoughts on why, I'm not trying to trap you or anything stupid like that.
BarryZola
TS Member
It would be a good sell due to its heritage (both historical and theme park years). Merlin could want shot due to the PR and financial liability the park has now become for them.
Yeah, decent points to be honest. Although, the point of it being one of their flagships with the heritage of the place may complicate that slightly. It is a good selling point but could also be seen as a loss to the overall brand of Merlin if they sold. Also, the Smiler story could possibly follow them around as a company anyway. It's a strange time at the moment which requires strong management.
bluesonichd
TS Member
Let's not forget Nick Leslau owns Towers not Merlin so it could be sold again and again and nothing would change. 
Matt.GC
TS Member
I think Merlin would be fine without Towers actually. Merlin are the company that 'owned the Sealifes that ended up buying the park's' anyway. The Legoland parks and the Midways are the core business for Merlin now and where completely unscathed by the Smiler crash. I think the company now see AT, Thorpe and Chessington as high maintenence annoyances. That's compounded with AT as it's a high risk, high Investment kind of park that has recently seen its reputation ruined. I'm in no doubt that if a reasonable offer was on the table, Merlin would offload AT in a heartbeat.Yeah, decent points to be honest. Although, the point of it being one of their flagships with the heritage of the place may complicate that slightly. It is a good selling point but could also be seen as a loss to the overall brand of Merlin if they sold. Also, the Smiler story could possibly follow them around as a company anyway. It's a strange time at the moment which requires strong management.