2020: General Discussion

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Danny, 20th Nov 2019.

  1. imanautie

    imanautie TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    3,633
    Likes Received:
    2,808
    Correct, hence the restriction to work around a serious design flaw.

    Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
     
    Ethan likes this.
  2. spinba11

    spinba11 TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    1,504
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    The 18 person rule wasn’t there from the start. I remember soon after it opened they were only loading half the train, maybe when they found it was running too fast. So they added the trims and added the rule.
     
    Ethan and imanautie like this.
  3. imanautie

    imanautie TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    3,633
    Likes Received:
    2,808
    Oh so it's not an original design cock up?

    Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
     
  4. Swarm Chris

    Swarm Chris TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    328
    I believe the trims were an addition after the original opening or at least testing. Seem to remember that once operating they found it running too fast through one section - so yep there's the original design problem - so added trims to sort it out.

    It appears the trims are not dynamic in any way, so are either on or off. On slows the train too much with low numbers of riders. Whilst off brings about the original problem, and presumably is now deemed unsafe for guests so can be used to allow smaller guest numbers - or just isn't an option to prevent a full train being sent with no trims active.
     
    Alsty likes this.
  5. Ethan

    Ethan TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    583
    How can thirteen possibly go 'too fast'. It'd be nice actually if it hit a decent speed. That's what makes the ride a bit dull. So it runs at 42mph so what if the trims were off it'd hit 48? That'd be a bit better
     
    Alsty likes this.
  6. Swarm Chris

    Swarm Chris TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    328
    If it's a structural issue, there'll be a bit of track somewhere, even if quite small, that can't take that bit of extra speed and in-turn force. So I'd assume the addition of the trims has then neutered what was the original plan for the speed and feeling of the ride everywhere else.

    All in all, a bit of an embarrassment for Intamin. As they should have figured out their structural modelling by 2008-10 when it was in design.
     
  7. James

    James TS Founding Member

    Messages:
    3,921
    Likes Received:
    2,637
    Location:
    S.Wales
    The ride was originally pulling negative g's and hitting the brakes too hard, causing the ride to automatically shut down. So the trims were added later on to prevent this. John Wardley and co confirmed this when questioned about the late add-on of trims in 2010.

    There was a story going around at the time that a dummy flew out of a train during testing and Intamin offered a different restraint (ratchet lock) however this would have cost in excess of £100,000, so trims were seen as a more viable option. That was never confirmed.
     
    imanautie and Alsty like this.
  8. pluk

    pluk TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    1,131
    Likes Received:
    1,779
    Location:
    Essex
    I was told at the time (and have no idea if it is true but seems more likely than any potential force issues as it's so tame with or without trims), that the issue was clearing the first block too soon, arriving before the drop track was back in place. As there is no braking prior to the second lift and the tyre drive lifts do not have variable speeds, if the train arrives too soon there's no track in front of it yet so it rightly shuts down on the second tyre lift awaiting the resetting of the drop mechanism. Once that kicks in crappy tyre lift him is not able to reliably accelerate the train from a standing start on the incline at any speed effectively meaning the first block hasn't been cleared so the main lift hill also stops and any reliable running falls apart.

    It's a shame trims couldn't have been placed later in the circuit to give the system time to work out the level of trimming required. I guess if they were too far along though it's be too late to save enough time for the block clearance after the track reset.
     
    imanautie, Alsty and Islander like this.
  9. Alsty

    Alsty TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    2,065
    Likes Received:
    5,296
    Location:
    West Sussex
    Favourite Ride:
    Shambhala
    What a quality bit of engineering by Intamin :rolleyes:
     
    James, Swarm Chris and imanautie like this.
  10. Ethan

    Ethan TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    583
    Wow that's quite high for a smaller park like Chessington. Towers must be around 10k then
     
  11. Mr Pearse

    Mr Pearse TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    580
    Likes Received:
    581
    You’d think that but if Chessington was running at 5k a day they are only running at approx 30 percent capacity. So With that in mind towers would be operating at around 8-9k a day Maybe more.
     
  12. Matt N

    Matt N TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    5,733
    Likes Received:
    4,499
    Location:
    Forest of Dean
    Favourite Ride:
    Mako (SeaWorld Orlando)
    With regard to Thirteen’s trims; I thought trims adjusted themselves dependant on the mass and speed of the train, to get the train to a certain desired speed? That’s what the trims on B&M rides like Mako do, anyway...
     
  13. John

    John TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    2,391
    Likes Received:
    3,024
    Location:
    Im Turm von Mystery Castle
    Favourite Ride:
    Steel Vengeance
    I think thirteens trims are either on or off, there's no subtlety to them.

    RE: guest numbers, interesting to see that there's a clear ramping up of capacity planned. Meanwhile, Chessington seems to have already sold out some dates. For some reason they also seem to be allowing twice as many pass holders in on zoo days (1st-3rd) compared with full opening when capacity should be higher. Seems a bit odd.
     
    Ethan, imanautie and Matt N like this.
  14. imanautie

    imanautie TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    3,633
    Likes Received:
    2,808
    I'm theorising that the reason passholder capacity is higher on zoo days isn't because capacity is higher but because they are prioritizing passholders to get tickets for zoo days

    Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
     
  15. Kraken27

    Kraken27 TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    984
    I don't think my eyesight is that dodgy... from the Accesso screenshot, it looks like capacity at Chessington is 500 per day, not 5k (ever such a slight difference). It's 1000 per day on the 3 zoo only days prior to the 4th July when they expect to reopen the theme park side.
     
  16. imanautie

    imanautie TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    3,633
    Likes Received:
    2,808
    The capacity is per package, I guessed 5k per day based on the 500 Chessington passholder capacity and peak Alton capacity of 4500

    Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
     
  17. Islander

    Islander TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    1,062
    Likes Received:
    1,262
    Location:
    Space Station Mir
    I'd also suggest that there's too much prominence being placed on these figures... just 'cause they're buried within the code of the Accesso page, doesn't mean they are accurate figures reflecting the park's true capacities.
     
  18. imanautie

    imanautie TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    3,633
    Likes Received:
    2,808
    It's been adjusted from 30000

    Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
     
  19. Swarm Chris

    Swarm Chris TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    328
    It's pretty much a case of some can, and some can't. For those that can't adapt, they'll just be set with a specific constant braking force. There'll be design and/or cost reasons as to why you would use one over the other.
     
    Matt N likes this.
  20. Ethan

    Ethan TowersStreet Member

    Messages:
    1,002
    Likes Received:
    583
    Are towers actually doing virtual queueing or just distancing in the queues?
     

Share This Page