Well if you're not a fan of inversions then off course you're bound to think it's nothing greatBeing the best high inversion coaster doesn’t stop it being an average experience overall.
Well if you're not a fan of inversions then off course you're bound to think it's nothing greatBeing the best high inversion coaster doesn’t stop it being an average experience overall.
I’m failing to see where he said he wasn’t a fan of inversions?Well if you're not a fan of inversions then off course you're bound to think it's nothing great
I think the smiler is the perfect crowd pleaser. Given its world record its the true gimmick of the park, not to say that's a bad thing though. They know that any record breaking ride will undoubtedly draw big crowds and with the amount of restrictions placed upon the park due to the location, it was the only ever logistical option. Can't build above a certain height, can't build the fastest as there isnt enough room, can't build the steepest when they already have a vertical drop. Inversions was the only option and given the space I think Wardley and everyone else involved did a fantastic job with the layoutI'd rather sit on a park bench than ride Colossus.
I don't rank coasters, but given the choice, without the travel logistics, I'd take 100 different coasters over Smiler in terms of the experience overall. Going upside down for the sake of it is not interesting. You only have to walk from X Sector to Forbidden Valley to see what fun you can have, with ten less inversions.
Because if he was a fan of inversions then he would rate the ride a lot higher. Its not a repetitive layout unlike Colossus so it doesn't get boringI’m failing to see where he said he wasn’t a fan of inversions?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I enjoy inversions; I don’t rate the Smiler all that highly.Because if he was a fan of inversions then he would rate the ride a lot higher. Its not a repetitive layout unlike Colossus so it doesn't get boring
Well I'm assuming that's either of 4 reasonsI enjoy inversions; I don’t rate the Smiler all that highly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BUT THERE YOU GO. You’ve literally, without prompt, just cited four valid reasons why people might not rate Smiler as highly as you .Well I'm assuming that's either of 4 reasons
1) It's presentation, given that it is admittedly on the dirty side
2) You find it rough and uncomfortable on certain inversions
3) You find it repetitive and uninspiring
4) You don't like the general theme and music
Come on, there's 2 airtime hills, give 'em credit.14 loops and the best bit is the airtime hill in the middle.
Maybe they should have had 14 airtime hills and 1 loop?
Actually is there a record for most airtime hills?
Well they are valid reasons, although you must be a snowflake to think the smiler is really rough. Anyone who has been on the Blackpool woodies will know they make the smiler seem like a B&MBUT THERE YOU GO. You’ve literally, without prompt, just cited four valid reasons why people might not rate Smiler as highly as you .
Your opinion on the Smiler is totally, 100% valid. But so is that of anyone who thinks it only average.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No point in that we'd be massively outnumbered in the debate. I know there are a few smiler fans on here but heck nearly the whole forum would be backing nemesis.Can we have a separate poll thread, "Smiler vs Nemesis" and then we can talk about other things here?
Don't really know why they're not doing it already tbh. Blackpool are doing it like you said so why are towers still only filling half thr rows on 2 of their most popular coastersAnd do we think that we will be filling all rows on rides any time soon (Blackpool as an example seem to be able to do so now so why aren’t Towers?)
It’s clear that the row thing isn’t a legal requirement either now that other parks aren’t bothering, so I’m genuinely wondering why the park didn’t pull the trigger in anticipation of the very busy half term ?