• ℹ️ Heads up...

    This is a popular topic that is fast moving Guest - before posting, please ensure that you check out the first post in the topic for a quick reminder of guidelines, and importantly a summary of the known facts and information so far. Thanks.

Alton Towers Facts

Slugjc said:
TedTheHuman said:
Charlie and the chocolate factory is based off Roald Dahl 's original book and neither the 1971 or 2005 film adaptations.



and thank god for that,
Couldn't have been any worse if it had, tbh! :p
 
TedTheHuman said:
Charlie and the chocolate factory is based off Roald Dahl 's original book and neither the 1971 or 2005 film adaptations.
Well, actually, no. The original editions of the book had one very important difference...

...The Oompaloompas were discribed as being black.

However, very soon attitudes changed, and the thought of going to a far away island and capturing "pygmies" with dark skin to work as slaves in your factory became unacceptable. So Dahl re-wrote the book to change a few details. It's ok to have slaves if they are orange, it seems ;)
 
DiogoJ42 said:
TedTheHuman said:
Charlie and the chocolate factory is based off Roald Dahl 's original book and neither the 1971 or 2005 film adaptations.
Well, actually, no. The original editions of the book had one very important difference...

...The Oompaloompas were discribed as being black.

However, very soon attitudes changed, and the thought of going to a far away island and capturing "pygmies" with dark skin to work as slaves in your factory became unacceptable. So Dahl re-wrote the book to change a few details. It's ok to have slaves if they are orange, it seems ;)

Ah never knew that. How's about "Charlie and the chocolate factory is closer to the books then both the film adaptations" then? Sound a bit better? =P
 
I think in the original draft of the book there were actually 12 children, one of whom was called Herpes Trout!
 
BigAl said:
Slugjc said:
TedTheHuman said:
Charlie and the chocolate factory is based off Roald Dahl 's original book and neither the 1971 or 2005 film adaptations.



and thank god for that,
Couldn't have been any worse if it had, tbh! :p


at least they didn't do willy wonka as micheal Jackson like the Johnny Depp film, and stuck to the original drawings.
 
Top