Why? Since when has Pleasure Beach been concerned about added safety?!Icon has tragically had seatbelts and awkwardly clunky grab handles fitted to the trains. I'm already looking forward to the decrease in throughputs!
I'm looking to rebook a trip to PB, I'm currently looking into midweek in June. Is this a good time to go? I've heard some rides like River Caves which I'd love to do might be closed. Any help would be appreciated, cheers!
What does this mean, out of interest? And surely Mack’s restraints are no less safe than other forms of lap bar only restraint without a seatbelt, such as the B&M hyper clamshells or the Maurer X-Car lap bars?Some insurance policies require triple redundancy and Mack hydraulic restraints are a rather unusual industry outlier with only double redundancy. Seatbelts bring it up to triple.
In simplistic terms the idea of redundancy is that if a mechanism fails, there is a back up in place. So in triple redundancy, you can have two failures and still have a third backup to keep the restraint in place. In double redundancy, you can only afford the initial failure and one more. Of course, the chance of any failure at all is miniscule.What does this mean, out of interest? And surely Mack’s restraints are no less safe than other forms of lap bar only restraint without a seatbelt, such as the B&M hyper clamshells or the Maurer X-Car lap bars?
Wouldn’t that make other rides with only lap bars, such as B&M hyper coasters without seatbelts, double redundancy as well? As well as the Gerstlauers without seatbelts, like Smiler?In simplistic terms the idea of redundancy is that if a mechanism fails, there is a back up in place. So in triple redundancy, you can have two failures and still have a third backup to keep the restraint in place. In double redundancy, you can only afford the initial failure and one more. Of course, the chance of any failure at all is miniscule.
So Macks only have two hydraulic canisters holding the restraint in place. Gerstlauers have three to my knowledge. Most B&M restraints work on a racheting system instead of a hydraulic one so it’s a bit of a different ball game.Wouldn’t that make other rides with only lap bars, such as B&M hyper coasters without seatbelts, double redundancy as well? As well as the Gerstlauers without seatbelts, like Smiler?
Or do B&M hypers and Gerstlauers have an additional layer of safety that makes them triple redundancy?
Eurofighters have two, not sure about Infinity, never worked on one.So Macks only have two hydraulic canisters holding the restraint in place. Gerstlauers have three to my knowledge. Most B&M restraints work on a racheting system instead of a hydraulic one so it’s a bit of a different ball game.
The other thing that should be mentioned is detection of the failure. If the first component fails, it's important that the system detects the loss of redundancy and then prevents further use.In simplistic terms the idea of redundancy is that if a mechanism fails, there is a back up in place. So in triple redundancy, you can have two failures and still have a third backup to keep the restraint in place. In double redundancy, you can only afford the initial failure and one more. Of course, the chance of any failure at all is miniscule.